课程概述
热门审阅
DG
May 23, 2016
I like this course very much! Rope is the cleverest task I have ever done! Of course, I hope in future I will work on even more difficult problems, but this is pretty good already for me as a student!
PS
Jul 9, 2020
I think the course content and assignments were great. A suggestion though, it will be more helpful if there are more and varied corner cases that would save time spent in thinking and making cases.
851 - Data Structures 的 875 个评论(共 934 个)
创建者 Ingram C
•Oct 8, 2025
good
创建者 Sirojbek O
•Oct 4, 2024
good
创建者 SHAZIB A
•May 24, 2023
good
创建者 K R
•Nov 15, 2021
Good
创建者 GADU R
•Jul 24, 2021
good
创建者 KONDURU M 2
•Jul 23, 2021
good
创建者 Himanshu S
•Jun 2, 2021
GOOD
创建者 Asha D
•May 28, 2021
nice
创建者 Madappa B
•Apr 21, 2021
good
创建者 K S
•Dec 15, 2020
good
创建者 DEVIREDDY R S
•Nov 27, 2020
Good
创建者 321910302007 g
•Nov 26, 2020
good
创建者 KONJETI S S V
•Nov 23, 2020
good
创建者 Pratik H
•Sep 29, 2020
Nice
创建者 Sarath C
•Jul 28, 2020
good
创建者 chaluvadi a
•Jul 13, 2020
good
创建者 SHIVAM G
•Jul 3, 2019
good
创建者 Tushar C
•Oct 18, 2024
...
创建者 221910303021 G C
•Jan 20, 2021
gg
创建者 Vanshika K
•Nov 1, 2020
NA
创建者 ABHINAV C
•Nov 17, 2024
.
创建者 Andrey T
•Jun 10, 2016
[Slightly updated according to Michael's questions]
The course is fine, but comparing to the previous one - Algorithmic Toolbox - this one is weaker and with lesser quality.
Pros: the course contains some interesting data structures and valuable observations. The starter files for assignments are in place. Related books are given after each video session. All the tasks have automatic grader. There is a couple of interesting tasks to do.
Cons: the material is mostly lectures, and there is even a video where lecturer just reads the article from Wiki (Splay tree - has the same information with same lack of some proofs). Expected: add quizzes as it was in the first course. The course has less weeks - only 4 as comparing to 5 in AT. So various important data structures are not discussed. The course has less homework - 3 tasks each week as comparing to 5 in AT. And all 3 are usually just implementations of some basic algos seen in lectures.
I consider the course valuable due to a number of good videos and a couple of good tasks to do. But in general, this course has the area for improvement.
创建者 Vlad
•May 13, 2016
The structure of the class follows the regular academic model you'll find in college: lecture -> lecture -> lecture -> assignment... repeat. I don't think this model is suitable for online delivery. Without discussion and the ability to interrupt and ask questions, the lectures are at times a more frustrating than useful (especially with Coursera's user interface, which lacks quick rewind and is generally speaking rather poorly thought out).
For many of the topics, better videos exist online (try safari or pluralsight). As for the problems, they were the main source of learning, but were also at times a bit frustrating (the splay trees starter code was rather sad to look at). I find that hacker rank is probably better at delivering value (if you can forego the warm fuzzy feeling you get from getting a verified certificate, you'll probably be better served by practicing on hacker rank than from doing the problems in this course).
创建者 Pancerny M
•Mar 31, 2020
Great set of topics, really good programming challenges. Lectures are NOT very helpful, mostly reading pseudocode from slides which don't make it easy to grasp the concept. Mostly I had to use other resources to understand what the lecture is about. Also, I was hoping that programming tasks will be set up the same way as in the Algorithmic Toolbox course where I could import/submit automatically everything to Coursera. For this course, none of the exercises were available in Pycharm for Edu.
创建者 Zhongyu K
•May 26, 2016
The depth and explanation of theoretical concepts are better than the first course. I like the in depth discussion over various introduced data structures, for instance there are comparisons between naive implementations vs smarter implementations. However overall the topic is very theoretical, maybe add a little more connection of each introduced data structure with respect to its application would make the topic less dry and more motivating.