Short and useful

Great learning!

good experiance

Great course!!!

Amazing course

It was Good.

Great Course

Overall Good

Great course

Good Course.

Too Tough

Enjoyable

Excellent

Thanks

Great

nice

good

GOOD

good

g

The quizzes are too difficult as the questions asked aren't explained very well in the videos. I took copious notes and still struggled with the quizzes. The quizzes cover areas that the videos only touch on, so I had to look up why my answers were wrong or what the correct answer was. I disliked the discussion questions as well since the students are asked to discuss Bernie Madoff and Lance Armstrong but those two cases are not discussed in the videos at all. It would be more beneficial to create discussions around the cases that are being presented in the videos rather than expecting students to do research. Moreover, one of the videos covers the Benford Analysis. It would be useful to include a case study where it was used to detect fraud. Even including an example of how it can be useful would be helpful. I still don't understand the value of it in fraud detection.

The course has some good content and also some real-life examples; I particularly enjoyed the insider stories about Crazy Eddie and Barry Minkows account of the ZZZZ Carpet Cleaning fraud. Also, the coverage of Worldcom was interesting. The real accounting ane examination part of the course is very basic though and is more like an explanation of what should be done rather than how it is actually done. You will get a general idea about what problems one could encounter when trying to investigate corporate fraud, money laundering and related crimes but you will not get insights e.g. on how you would see it in cash flow statements and what to look out for when analysing company financials. Also, hardly any coverage of accounting principles and practices. The overall presentation of the course is quite funny as very retro.

The course deserves 3 out of 5 stars. The main reason for my rating is its outdated content. Many of the topics covered are no longer relevant in today's environment. With rapidly evolving technologies and changes in the market, I expected more up-to-date and modern materials. However, the basic information and structure of the course remain useful, especially for beginners in the subject. Improving the quality and updating the content would greatly enhance the value of the course.

This course provides a good introduction into the world of fraud examination, but it doesn't really go into forensic accounting that much. I had also hoped for some personal examples from the professors given their breath and depth of experience in the field (if at all possible). There also doesn't seem to be that much interaction between students, and students with professors. I would be very interested in signing up for a fraud specialization should there ever be one ...

The course is interesting and useful, but could be a lot better. Transcripts often have errors and content often doesn't cover some concepts well, even if they are on tests. Tests often seem to pull duplicate questions from the battery. Explanations for correct/incorrect test answers sometimes seem to conflict with each other and other information. Forums are plagued by now-common ChatGPT and other copy/pasted responses.