Even decades into the Information Age, accounting practices yet fail to recognize the financial value of information. Moreover, traditional asset management practices fail to recognize information as an asset to be managed with earnest discipline. This has led to a business culture of complacence, and the inability for most organizations to fully leverage available information assets.
This second course in the two-part Infonomics series explores how and why to adapt well-honed asset management principles and practices to information, and how to apply accepted and new valuation models to gauge information’s potential and realized economic benefits. In addition, the course will enlighten students on the critical but confounding issues of information ownership, property rights, and sovereignty. The course will wrap up with an overview of emergent roles for the information-savvy organization of the 21st century.
JS
Great course! Highly recommended for people who want to understand data valuation.
N
I'm not got my certification of my course completion
LM
Very interesting course for all interested in Information, and how to evaluate information value.
BI
I am so excited to have learnt so much on coursera. i would absolutely recommend.
显示：11/11
Very interesting course for all interested in Information, and how to evaluate information value.
I'm not got my certification of my course completion
Great course! Highly recommended for people who want to understand data valuation.
I am so excited to have learnt so much on coursera. i would absolutely recommend.
I'm so grateful to you <3
Good
Good
g
g
The content of the course is practical and relevant to current business uses and challenges related to data acquisition, storage, usage, security, licensing, and many other aspects of information ecosystems. Delivery of the material by the instructor, Doug Laney, showed deep knowledge of both academic research and every-day business scenarios data-driven professionals encounter. The only reason this review is 4-star instead of 5-star is that some of the quiz questions seemed overly focused on subjective terminology and wordplay rather than conceptual understanding of course material. Of course, I realize that "knock" on the quizzes is subjective as well, but reviews are intended to be subjective (at least to a degree!).
Super