学生对 University of Michigan 提供的 Instructional Methods in Health Professions Education 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
SM
Nov 6, 2017
Quiz 03.02 is very vague in what answer is expected. Even after several tried I was unable to complete the quiz. Please look into the issue. Otherwise the course content and delivery is excellent
WR
Jul 7, 2022
Really good teaching programme. Massively increased my confidence with teaching, and I will definately change and improve my practice. Would certainly recommend to anyone who would listen.
126 - Instructional Methods in Health Professions Education 的 147 个评论(共 147 个)
创建者 mohamed r
•Oct 23, 2016
Nice instruction and instructor but if i do not have any idea about health education, it would have been difficult to me. we need also some more details (larger course).
创建者 Salik M
•Jun 13, 2021
Good Course! Interesting Content. Appropriate difficulty and workload. Well made and well structured.
创建者 Carla J N
•Sep 2, 2020
Great guidance and feedback from peers. Great ideas to integrate technology to clinical practice
创建者 HIBA A O F
•Oct 13, 2019
Thank you very much..really its very interest and informative course
Best Regards
Hiba Fadl
创建者 Joe O
•Oct 26, 2024
Excellent, could complete in my own time with options to have additional resources
创建者 Jaweria S
•Dec 5, 2021
A good course to revisit concepts of Health Professions Education
创建者 Muhammad E E E
•May 26, 2020
very good, organized, helpful and knowledgable course.. thank you
创建者 Gabriela P
•Sep 27, 2020
Very useful to provide the basics of medical education.
创建者 Bryan H
•Feb 6, 2020
lively video teaching with some varied activities
创建者 Dorji P
•Oct 31, 2020
Very nice course
创建者 Navjyot T
•Nov 12, 2024
NA
创建者 Nima A S
•Mar 19, 2017
T
创建者 Kyle b
•Oct 30, 2020
The delivery was excellent. I enjoyed the various methods taught and utilized during the course. I found it highly engaging that she would utilize the various methods she was teaching about. The reason for the 3 stars over 5 is the marking of other student's work. Peer review is essential, however, waiting several weeks just to get a response graded was frustrating. If I could make a suggestion, have a template of a few different submissions at the ready for when there are no other peer papers/grades to review. This way students who work at a faster pace can enjoy the freedom of finishing early and show their success.
创建者 Larissa E
•Aug 25, 2020
Interesting course content. however very physician focused. I had assumed the course would be relevant to allied health professionals as well, but it is really narrowed in on physicians teaching other physicians.
创建者 VIJAYASREE A
•Sep 10, 2024
instant feedback to students and adjust teaching based on their understanding.
创建者 Emily S
•Jun 13, 2016
The course itself is good, however the assessments need to be worked on
创建者 Eric P
•Aug 26, 2016
The irony of the fact that a course that was meant to teach how to appropriate evaluate adult learners was full of quizzes that were riddled with "guess what I'm thinking" short answer questions and multiple choice questions with > or < 1 correct answer was not lost on me. I ended up leaving the course during week three after issues with a quiz that was described in the forums as "impossible." It's too bad - the course description was very promising.
创建者 Takondwa N C
•Jun 1, 2020
I had to extend the course twice because there is no system to ensure that assignments are peer-reviewed on time. Even if one completes all the tasks ahead of schedule. They could have moderators to ensure that learners are no inconvenienced for not having enough students enrolled in the course to meet the peer-review criteria. The course seems to be running itself.
创建者 Deleted A
•May 6, 2017
I so wanted this course to be great, but after three quizzes where I had to do pure trial and error as it was 'guess what I'm thinking', the last one where my 'clean hands' answer for a checklist item on keeping a sterile environment was marked wrong, I reluctantly gave up and unenrolled. Very disappointing
创建者 PRAVEEN K K
•Aug 2, 2024
Personally I do not find this course as a good source of information... content coverage was peripheral and assignments were very much basic level.. neither interesting nor thought provoking.. corner of my mind, I feel that money got wasted.. I do not recommend
创建者 Sam T
•Apr 28, 2017
Study material DOES NOT cover tested material appropriately. For those quizzes I took, I ended up doing them by trial and error. Took one of them seven times just changing answers. Quiz 3 is so ambiguous that I am giving up.
创建者 Bruna D C
•Feb 14, 2024
o curso é oferecido em fiversas linguas mas só aceita resposta nas atividades em ingles