课程概述
热门审阅
AZ
Apr 8, 2026
Dictor could read the material more professionally.
CT
Dec 2, 2024
Content is well designed and easy to understand and follow. Audio could be improved. Sometimes is very soft and difficult to hear the narrator even through headphone.
76 - Six Sigma Principles 的 90 个评论(共 90 个)
创建者 Rafael C F
•Jul 31, 2025
Content is old, some of the videos doesn't have transcript and/or subtitles, misleading words in the transcript and also, something that they don't say clearly but in the description of the course is, you need to complement it with a book. It's good to know what is it about but I wouldn't recommend
创建者 Andreas T
•Mar 30, 2025
There are some videos with very low voice, so I can't hear clearly. Unfortunately, some of the low-voice videos don't have the subtitle/transcript.
创建者 Sampada S
•Jun 27, 2025
There is certain videos where the audio is very feeble or missing and transcript are also missing
创建者 Furqan A
•Dec 27, 2024
Not as in depth as I hoped it would be.
创建者 Shaun A
•Jan 28, 2026
The course suffers from misalignment between instruction and assessment, unclear or missing foundational explanations, and poor production quality—making it frustrating. Several exam questions reference material that is never taught or defined in the course, including Belbin team roles, Black Belt training expectations, and key Lean concepts. Core tools like histograms and Pareto charts are assigned without instruction, forcing learners to seek external resources despite being graded. This is compounded by ambiguous quiz questions, inconsistent audio quality, and distracting production issues, all of which undermine clarity, trust, and learning effectiveness.
创建者 Carrie E R
•Feb 5, 2026
this is terrible. the sound is inconsistent. the deck looks 20 years old and poorly done even by those standards. the speakers are not well-trained, stumbling over words, pausing for long periods as if they are reading the script, and not speaking clearly. if i had paid for this course by itself, I would have requested a refund.
创建者 LAURA M G C
•Mar 16, 2026
The course content is very good; however, I am having technical difficulties. Many videos have broken audio, and others lack subtitles in both English and Spanish. This makes it very difficult to follow the lessons and fully understand the material.
创建者 Maria J
•Mar 21, 2026
Some helpful information, overall poor execution. Text is read off of badly designed slides, grammatical errors, no application of content, exam questions are poorly written and test memorization of facts rather than the understanding.
创建者 Maurizio R
•Feb 3, 2025
Content sometimes is incomplete. Many videos lacks of transcript and audio is very low
创建者 John N
•Mar 21, 2026
Waste of time. "Instructor" seems to be trying to speed run through videos. Quizzes do not reflect the material covered in the videos.
创建者 Jordan C
•Jan 31, 2026
The content is riddled with errors and graded assessments ask questions that are not covered in the course content.
创建者 Bas J
•Sep 8, 2025
I dropped out. This course was created in 2016. I will look for a more contemporary course
创建者 Dalia A
•Dec 4, 2024
very poor content; the PowerPoint content do not match with the explanation
创建者 Eduardo V
•Apr 30, 2025
Awful. The videos don't help to answer the quizzes at all.
创建者 M N
•Jul 2, 2025
Rote teaching. No reading material.