Chevron Left
返回到 Introduction to Spreadsheets and Models

学生对 University of Pennsylvania 提供的 Introduction to Spreadsheets and Models 的评价和反馈

4.2
3,876 个评分

课程概述

The simple spreadsheet is one of the most powerful data analysis tools that exists, and it’s available to almost anyone. Major corporations and small businesses alike use spreadsheet models to determine where key measures of their success are now, and where they are likely to be in the future. But in order to get the most out of a spreadsheet, you have the know-how to use it. This course is designed to give you an introduction to basic spreadsheet tools and formulas so that you can begin harness the power of spreadsheets to map the data you have now and to predict the data you may have in the future. Through short, easy-to-follow demonstrations, you’ll learn how to use Excel or Sheets so that you can begin to build models and decision trees in future courses in this Specialization. Basic familiarity with, and access to, Excel or Sheets is required....

热门审阅

MM

Jun 21, 2017

This course has made me understand cost accounting, has provided a fresh perspective on how to solve some of the challenges i had with management accounting and as a bonus, made me love maths again :)

RJ

Jun 11, 2020

The course is worth the time , the faculty teaches you about some complicated advance formulae with so much clarity and ease that even beginners can be pro in excel related to business and finance.

筛选依据:

551 - Introduction to Spreadsheets and Models 的 575 个评论(共 723 个)

创建者 Patrick K

Feb 20, 2018

quizzes were poorly written but interesting content

创建者 Ifeanyichukwu H N

Aug 2, 2018

Some Quiz questions were a little bit open ended

创建者 Prithvir J

Jun 10, 2020

didnt learn much and the quizzes were terrible

创建者 Rui R

Dec 26, 2020

some parts of the sessions are very confused

创建者 Steve H

Mar 31, 2020

Very hard to plug in formulas on the quizes.

创建者 ANGEL F U

Dec 29, 2019

Students need more explanation and practice.

创建者 Francisco J S M

Nov 21, 2017

Content is good but not practical enough

创建者 TOMAS

Aug 10, 2016

too superficial in the discussed ideas

创建者 Patrick N

Oct 14, 2021

vague and minimal reviewing material

创建者 Bei J

Jul 1, 2017

quiz design is extremely confusing

创建者 Hector P

Apr 18, 2016

A bit too basic at the beginning.

创建者 Scott

May 6, 2020

Quiz questions were ambiguous.

创建者 MICHELE F

Aug 19, 2022

Peer-works would be usefull!

创建者 Xi R

Feb 13, 2018

Material is not deep enough.

创建者 kasite u

Jun 30, 2021

quizzes were confusing

创建者 Yousef A

Sep 9, 2022

needs more examples

创建者 Viktor L

Mar 23, 2016

Good course overall

创建者 Henrik Y

Jan 13, 2021

Very tough quizzes

创建者 Thomas V

Oct 15, 2018

No implementation

创建者 Yu P Y

Jun 1, 2016

Good introduction

创建者 Nimit A

Apr 15, 2025

not deep enough

创建者 GUANXIONG H

Mar 17, 2016

Poor quize

创建者 Shrenik V Z

Jan 10, 2018

better

创建者 Arthur V

Sep 27, 2023

ben

创建者 Orlando C

May 7, 2018

The Wharton School and Penn by extension has taken such tremendous effort to put together a great on-line offering. Some of their finest professors have made some of their rigorous coursework easily accessible via this platform.

This course however is one of the weakest that I have experienced both on this platform and from The Wharton School. The material covered is indeed dry in nature but the lectures - uninspiring - make it more so. The quizzes, designed to test your retention and understanding of material covered are ambiguously worded and not at all helpful in developing skill level around modeling. In more than one case, students are asked to write formulas that can use input data to create an output that will help make a decision. Many correct formulas are not recognized as correct by an overly rigid set of data in the grading system. That creates confusion - not helpful in developing skills.

Words such as "simplify" and "logical" appear in quizzes. These words are subjective, so the "logic" of a student may be different from the "logic" of the professor. Again, creates confusion.

It could be that one of the objectives of the professor is to get the student to think differently about modeling so as not to be overly linear. If that is the case, that is a good objective. However, whatever the objectives are - they are not clear nor directly put.

If you have little experience with financial models you will likely find this course to be both confusing and frustrating. If you have had some exposure to financial models you may find this course to be even more confusing and frustrating.