Chevron Left
返回到 Writing and Editing: Drafting

学生对 University of Michigan 提供的 Writing and Editing: Drafting 的评价和反馈

4.8
星
370 个评分

课程概述

This third course in the “Good with Words: Writing and Editing” series will give you a number of strategies to help with what is often the most intimidating, even paralyzing part of the writing process: getting started. You’ll learn about the “planning fallacy” and “temptation bundling.” You’ll get a chance to experiment with “freewriting” and “writing before you are ready.” And you’ll continue to benefit, through our ongoing “Good Sentences” and “Takeaways” segments, from the models and advice of a diverse set of writers. As with the other three courses in this series, you will also get access to a wide range of books and other resources you can use even after you finish the course. These include: (1) the readings and exercises provided to the students who have taken the in-person version of this course at the University of Michigan and the University of Chicago; (2) two digital libraries of excellent writing from a diverse collection of journalists, scientists, novelists, poets, historians, and entrepreneurs; and (3) a monthly “Good Sentences” email....

热门审阅

CM

Jun 12, 2023

Great course for getting more into drafting. Course is not focused on the mechanics of drafting, but rather considerations to have about writing.

JM

Jan 3, 2021

Patrick Barry has put together a terrific series of courses! Skills in the nuances of writing, organizing complex ideas, planning, how to get around 'blocks' and get started. Well worth it!

筛选依据：

76 - Writing and Editing: Drafting 的 78 个评论（共 78 个）

创建者 COBSIN, A T

•

Jul 10, 2021

It's not as informational as the first course is. It has a lot of repetition from the previous courses.

创建者 LOW S M

•

May 22, 2020

not suitable for me

创建者 Simone M

•

Feb 15, 2022

I expect more learning points in the seemingly most important course of this specialization while only learnt get started / get your 1st draft done / write before you're ready. Don't you think they are only repetitive?