课程概述
热门审阅
IA
Aug 28, 2023
This course is a good start for getting an overall idea about C# in a structured way. This course is highly recommended for those who already know C# but not yet having any certifications
FM
Oct 1, 2023
This is very helpful for me for my skills and I appreciate Coursera platform to give me this opportunity to learn such a strong OOP and C# concepts.
51 - C# for .NET Developers 的 73 个评论(共 73 个)
创建者 RAI A A
•Apr 21, 2024
BEST
创建者 Debanjan G
•Feb 12, 2024
good
创建者 Himanshu K 2
•Oct 31, 2025
ds
创建者 Bhoomika R
•Mar 10, 2025
.
创建者 Peace B
•Nov 29, 2023
So much details/concepts with good examples communicated. It's a good course to understand OOP and advanced concepts of C# programming.
创建者 Marco L
•Mar 23, 2025
I was great and well explained, it would be better to have some exercises for practice (even if it was in the last module)
创建者 XiangDong F
•Jul 23, 2023
This course gave me a quick understanding of C#, without getting overly fixated on the details.
创建者 Samuel A
•Jun 1, 2024
I didn't think understanding would be effortless, but I was wrong.
创建者 Nuwaf A
•Oct 22, 2024
Greatest course for .net developers
创建者 Bogdan T
•Aug 25, 2023
Basic informations about C#.
创建者 مجهول
•Apr 16, 2024
vary good this content
创建者 Abdulreuf K
•Jul 23, 2024
amazing course
创建者 walaa h
•Jul 22, 2023
great Content
创建者 Jaafar A
•Nov 5, 2024
Good Course
创建者 Barun B
•Apr 27, 2024
good
创建者 Saisree P
•Feb 25, 2024
Good
创建者 Justin M
•Jun 15, 2024
Many things were not covered in depth, many examples seemed rushed or unpolished.
创建者 Rebecca A
•Nov 19, 2023
Week 1 and 2 good, week 3 more complex and didn't explain it very well
创建者 Brayan S B
•Dec 30, 2024
Lot of things that are usefull but not in deep
创建者 Ismail A A
•Oct 26, 2023
The course is not for new-to-programming
创建者 Nadezhda S
•Aug 26, 2024
I was needed practical tasks
创建者 Hossein A
•Jan 4, 2024
it is not deep
创建者 Carlos M C
•Aug 8, 2024
Some parts of the course are alright but as the course progress the quality declines quickly. Last part of second module and third module introduces concepts so shallow that a list of links for would have been better rather than spent 30-45 minutes of uninteresting shallowness.