The introduction to client requirements was quite helpful. However, what was missing for me is what to do with those requirements, like breaking them down into smaller requirements and going more closer to the software. Therefore, for me it was a quite good introduction into user stories. But nothing more.

The target group are students without any experience. The quiz's live are made to test your knowledge of the English language.

not as well put together as the previous ones - perhaps you should consider breaking it into smaller, manageable pieces.

The material / question sets does appear ambiguous with little context to answer questions confidently.

Writing the user story was good but then the ambiguous requirements were just too much.

The exam questions could have been written more clearly.

Questions in the last assesment were quite confusing

Too high level course. Expected more from it.

.

Incredibly frustrated by the peer grading system. I've been able to work on the course at relatively fast pace and have now completed all of the lectures, readings, quizzes and test but can't go on to the next course because not enough people have submitted the homework for me to grade. I understand the advantage of being able to "learn from others" but it doesn't outweigh the disadvantage of not being able to work at one's own pace .

I don't know how useful the ambiguous requirements exercise is when we only have one-way feedback. I also think that the ambiguous requirements exercise is the most important of the course, and the exercise missed the mark.

I would suggest you structure that exercise as a dialogue, where a PM is working with the customer to elicit requirements, and not give us a big long wish-list of functionality. Structured as a dialogue, you can show that a PM would ask, "You said that the game would make noise. When is the first time it makes noise? How often would game noises be made? Does it ever stop? What makes it stop? Why even have the game make noise in the first place? Are there different noises made during the course of game play/"

So, I can't recommend this particular course, and I'm concerned about what the capstone will look like if you give us an assignment where we're to make sense of functionality delivered as a block of text .

It contains many graded peer review activities. Most of the time, the reviews are nonsense, and we get stuck waiting for a serious person to review our work. It is better to set quizzes or projects that the instructors review.

The final module of this course is so absurd that you must not waste your time with the previous ones is you want a certificate. Better take some other course.

The grading questions are too vague. The answers are not precise but would depend on the perception of the person.

Parts are missing from the capstone project, so this series cannot be completed.