Chevron Left
返回到 Finance for Non-Financial Professionals

学生对 University of California, Irvine 提供的 Finance for Non-Financial Professionals 的评价和反馈

4.6
4,562 个评分

课程概述

This course is for non-financial professionals, managers, and business leaders seeking to understand core finance and accounting concepts to drive organizational growth and impact financial decisions. You will gain a basic understanding of finance and accounting principles, enabling you to analyze financial information and assess the impact of your decisions across functional areas. Specific topics include financial analysis, planning, forecasting, budgeting, cash flow management, and strategic financing. You will learn to apply these concepts through practical exercises, potentially leveraging tools like Microsoft Excel for financial analysis and forecasting. Upon completing this course, you will be able to: 1. Explain the importance of finance and interpretation of financial information. 2. Apply accounting and finance concepts to analyze financials. 3. Understand key accounting and finance terms. 4. Examine financial statements using key ratios. 5. Explain the importance of the budgeting process. 6. Learn key components needed to improve profitability. To be successful in this course, no prior finance or accounting background is required....

热门审阅

AC

Dec 14, 2017

I've enjoyed this course. Prof. Standen gives a very basic but clear overview of the most common financial topics, wished I had this course a couple of years ago it would have made my life way easier.

SR

Oct 3, 2015

Probably the single best course I have seen on finance and, by extension, accounting for those of us going in more or less clueless. It's actually an entertaining course and easy to keep watching.

筛选依据:

826 - Finance for Non-Financial Professionals 的 850 个评论(共 922 个)

创建者 Moisés P D

Sep 12, 2015

Great course.

创建者 Cindy C

Aug 24, 2015

great course!

创建者 Rehab G

Jan 19, 2019

very useful

创建者 Wendy S

Nov 13, 2020

Muy bueno

创建者 Hamza A

May 10, 2023

very good

创建者 F L

Jul 16, 2019

Nice one!

创建者 himanshu k

Dec 3, 2018

Nice work

创建者 Anuj A

Aug 19, 2021

jhakasss

创建者 Hassan H

Aug 18, 2017

Awesome!

创建者 kaung n

Apr 11, 2016

awesome!

创建者 Hoang A

Dec 25, 2017

Usefull

创建者 Shakti P M

Jul 11, 2022

Good

创建者 Anu K D

Nov 6, 2021

Good

创建者 BHAKEY S S S

Aug 23, 2020

GOOD

创建者 Abdirahman A M

Oct 24, 2017

G

o

o

d

创建者 JinHee L

Sep 27, 2016

dull

创建者 Devi P K

Aug 22, 2025

na

创建者 Vanesa V

Sep 9, 2021

.

创建者 정 진

Apr 15, 2018

g

创建者 Wesley R

Jul 3, 2017

-

创建者 Pierre

Mar 5, 2017

G

创建者 Narayan M

Jan 3, 2017

.

创建者 Lee B

Mar 8, 2021

The introductory content is all there but some of the material is missing -- the lecturer refers to worked examples, tools to play with and alternative formulations which I could not find anywhere on the system. It also was not clear to me how to ask questions about the construction of some of the terms used, which made it feel like I was not really on a two-way course but rather just in receipt of some stuff. In weeks 3 and 4 the video and transcript starts to jump around a *lot* -- given the rate at which new calculation terms are introduced in these weeks, it makes them very difficult to absorb. The peer reviewed assignment is very good and more worked examples to do at home would be very useful.

创建者 Jim R

Mar 31, 2021

It was a good high-level overview, but I felt it was missing some critical details, such as, when calculating the DuPont triangle, one key factor is calculating shareholder equity. Still, the course doesn't callout that you need to use the average shareholder equity to get the calculation correct. The good news is, I researched on other forums and found that out before doing the coursework, and I'll never forget it now!

创建者 Sanjeev S

Jan 2, 2016

This is a good course to introduce the novice to financial terms used in common place.

But in my opinion, the instructor could have a gone a bit further, explaining about Markets, Stocks, Bonds etc.

Types of transactions involved.

Maybe its expecting too much, but still, just a suggestion