学生对 California Institute of the Arts 提供的 Introduction to Game Design 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
TN
Apr 12, 2020
I really loved doing this course. Learnt how to make a simple game and make it really interesting! I loved how the easily the instructor was able to teach us and make us curious throughout the course.
DG
Feb 12, 2020
The lecture videos from Professor Fran and his old friend were surprisingly entertaining. Kudos to the team because they were able to make it fun, informative, and engaging throughout the four weeks.
651 - Introduction to Game Design 的 675 个评论(共 849 个)
创建者 Senala P
•Jun 12, 2016
Amazing.
创建者 Suhana P
•Dec 31, 2023
Amazing
创建者 Sujeet K
•Jun 16, 2022
awesome
创建者 Pavlo K
•Mar 31, 2021
Amazing
创建者 Gabriel V d A S
•Sep 9, 2017
Awesome
创建者 Klaus D D d S
•Jul 27, 2017
Nice!!!
创建者 Cemil B U
•May 18, 2021
Awsome
创建者 Nelson J R d S
•May 27, 2020
top d+
创建者 Chris T
•May 26, 2018
fun ;)
创建者 Licínio S
•Mar 19, 2018
Great!
创建者 Daniel D
•Jan 26, 2017
Nice!!
创建者 Joel P
•Mar 5, 2017
Great
创建者 HIMANI S
•Jan 11, 2025
best
创建者 Vissveash A M
•Oct 22, 2024
nice
创建者 Charalambos
•Jul 30, 2024
good
创建者 Bách N Đ
•Jan 9, 2024
Good
创建者 Jeremy D Y L
•Sep 14, 2021
good
创建者 Luis A D B
•Apr 23, 2021
cool
创建者 Syed F B S A R
•Jun 23, 2020
Fun!
创建者 盛成成
•Oct 15, 2017
nice
创建者 Daniel O
•Nov 22, 2021
ok
创建者 Javier I C S
•Jul 10, 2020
OK
创建者 Bilge K
•Nov 28, 2015
<3
创建者 Derek P
•May 23, 2025
**TL;DR:** The instructor of this course is engaging and explains the basics of game design effectively. The hands-on projects are useful, but the peer review system has flaws. Overall, it's a great starting point for anyone interested in game design, in my opinion. This course is very hands-on, with each module providing just enough information from the instructor to grasp a concept before assigning a project that applies those concepts. The instructor is fun to watch and conveys information in an easy-to-understand manner. However, the major drawback of this course is the peer feedback system. When it works, it’s beneficial, but when it doesn't, it can be quite frustrating for two main reasons. First, some students' feedback is unhelpful—sometimes it's just a one-word answer like "yes," or completely unrelated comments such as "The game was good because it has game design." This issue seems to stem from a combination of language barriers in some cases, which is understandable, but in others, it appears to be sheer laziness. The second issue arises when you're required to review peer projects. You must review a minimum of three projects each time, which is fine, except for two problems: First, some of the projects I had to review dated back two years, making it unlikely that my feedback would be relevant today. These older projects should have been removed. Second, I encountered projects from students who didn’t seem to care about putting in the effort—some of them uploaded nothing, while others submitted work generated by AI. I had to grade multiple projects as zero due to a lack of content to review. This situation feels unfair to those who are genuinely trying and deserve constructive feedback. Although this issue is not entirely the fault of the course, it is still a negative aspect. Therefore, I can't give this course a 5-star rating. However, the quality remains high, and I learned exactly what I expected and hoped for through the hands-on projects, so a 4-star rating seems fair.
创建者 Oguz G
•Apr 17, 2016
This course provides a nice insight into the gaming theory. Do not expect to make a dive into video game analysis. This game focuses on the fundamental ideas behind gaming, which includes all games. However, the assignments revolve around building board games, so you do not need to worry about not knowing any coding to make video games. Assignment criteria could use some polish, as the rubrics focus too much on mechanics (is it one page long?) rather than content elements. The delivery of the content is interesting. The instructor has gone to great lengths to bring in features that will help you focus better. There could be a better 100% integration between the material in the videos and the assignments, as sometimes you are asked to use only a tiny portion of 30 minutes of videos for the week, and that can make the videos less useful, or the assignment not as educational.