学生对 IBM 提供的 Gen AI Foundational Models for NLP & Language Understanding 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
RR
Jan 28, 2026
AI Foundational and LLMs is learning career growth.
TM
Jan 31, 2025
the material is topnotch but the delivery is a bit fast I would rather it was slower
26 - Gen AI Foundational Models for NLP & Language Understanding 的 36 个评论(共 36 个)
创建者 Tammam M
•Feb 1, 2025
the material is topnotch but the delivery is a bit fast I would rather it was slower
创建者 Projjal G
•Oct 27, 2025
The lab materials are very complicated could be made abstract using tensorflow.
创建者 Samer A
•Mar 27, 2026
It is a great course thank you so much.
创建者 Yury J M B
•Jun 6, 2025
mas practica
创建者 Serghei I
•Jun 1, 2025
Challenging but insightful course. A solid grasp of discrete math is essential — otherwise, many concepts will be hard to follow. The course heavily relies on mathematical formulas, some of which deserve dedicated lessons. Certain coding labs use outdated libraries, which made reproducing results time-consuming due to API changes. Despite the fast pace and compressed explanations of complex topics, the course offers valuable foundational insights. Ideally, this material could be split into two or three separate courses for better depth and clarity.
创建者 Muhammad A k
•Jan 3, 2025
The content is good but its very difficult to understand as its not for the beginners. Explanation part is very limited and labs are very detailed making it difficult to understand.
创建者 Nate R
•Jan 29, 2026
Many of the library versions in the labs are out of date and should be updated
创建者 Christian H
•Dec 20, 2025
I am a bit disappointed with this course. In a nutshell, if you know the content already and need a refresher then this is good. If this is the first time learning about the concepts... good luck. Lets start with the pros: 1) Labs are great 2) Overall the core course content is good Now to the cons: 1) The monotone AI narration is extremely annoying and often too fast 2) Some slides are just walking through code snippets quickly without proper explainations 3) I learned more from the labs then the course slides If this material is somewhat familiar, this is a good course. If you are here to learn something new, then be prepared to use other sources to understand the material. I am really struggling when I see courses about a fascinating topic that are getting dragged down by the implementation. Please use a human narrator who explains the content so that the learner does not have to use other sources. Also why can't we have longer videos? It feels that explanations are suffering because the content has to fit in an 6-8 min video. Don't underestimate your learners. They can handle a 20 min video, but they are not happy with a half-baked explanation.
创建者 Basyed M
•Apr 15, 2026
I really disliked the heavy use of functional programming in the labs, several lines of code (sometimes whole methods) are combined into single unreadable lines, its like whoever made it forgot that we are LEARNING so we're supposed to read the code and understand what it does its a shame because its literally where the crux of the learning happens. and the Robotic AI voice didnt help as well
创建者 Ahmed A
•Mar 7, 2026
Explanation tooo fast. I cannot follow with the instructor. The slides with code are literally useless. I cannot follow with him. Too fast. This is waste of time and money and unfair
创建者 Ethan K
•Aug 27, 2025
This course is soooo boring. It feels like it's written by robots for robots. I want to see humans teaching material and making it understandable, interesting, and relatable. This is just ai-slop.