Cool Way of explanation and good hands on as well

There is no live codding videos form the lecture

Some users not properly review your applications

Basic but essential concepts of the Go language

it is a good start for newbies in go language

more of the implementation should be thought

Great explanation and approach—many thanks!

Good content and assignments covers basics.

The course is amazing, simple, and concise.

Exams would be better with example output

Step by step, straightforward. Thanks!

The course has few mistakes on slides.

Great course, good introduction to Go.

Good basic course for go fundamentals

This course is very good for beginner

I really miss more coding examples

Peers review sometimes are unfair

Good introduction - Easy to start

Good base knowledge about Golang

Slides are not 100% accurate

Relatively basic course

good for beginners

Nice Course

good

There are a lot of errors in the videos (syntax of code) which made learning the syntax confusing. The instructions for the assignment were confusing at times and sometimes conflicted with the grading rubrics. For example the slice.go activity has lots of strange details (start with an "empty slice of length 3") which seems like a mistake (maybe capacity of 3?) which made coding and grading confusing. Another example is findian.go, one of the sample input is something like "I asd asd das ds N" which is very difficult to handle using fmt.Scan() for a new Go programmer which is the way of getting input taught in the lesson.. I feel like the instructor never went through i did the exercises following the instructions closely to experience these problems. Finally, in general the programming exercises need more details about expected inputs and expected outputs. Since we are grading peer's works, it make its hard when one peer expected one thing and other expected something else. i feel like im coding extra code to herd my grader toward my version of expected input to prevent them from giving me 0/10 just cuz i didnt follow THEIR expected inputs. The next version of this specialization series is better on details (though I still see errors in presentation video) but this first getting started course could need some improvements.