Chevron Left
返回到 Introduction to HTML5

学生对 University of Michigan 提供的 Introduction to HTML5 的评价和反馈

4.7
星
27,780 个评分

课程概述

Thanks to a growing number of software programs, it seems as if anyone can make a webpage. But what if you actually want to understand how the page was created? There are great textbooks and online resources for learning web design, but most of those resources require some background knowledge. This course is designed to help the novice who wants to gain confidence and knowledge. We will explore the theory (what actually happens when you click on a link on a webpage?), the practical (what do I need to know to make my own page?), and the overlooked (I have the code, but how do I put it on the web to share with others?). Throughout the course there will be a strong emphasis on adhering to syntactic standards for validation and semantic standards to promote wide accessibility for users with disabilities. This course will appeal to a wide variety of people, but specifically those who would like a step-by-step description of the basics. There are no prerequisites for this course and it is assumed that students have no prior programming skills or IT experience. The course will culminate in a small final project that will require the completion of a very simple page with links and images. The focus of this course is on the basics, not appearance. You can see a sample final HTML page at https://example-site-1--wd4ehtml.repl.co/ . This is the first course in the Web Design For Everybody specialization. Subsequent courses focus on the marketable skills of styling the page with CSS3, adding interactivity with JavaScript and enhancing the styling with responsive design....

热门审阅

SC

Aug 28, 2020

This course has really alot of things to learn along with code and the most important that we miss usually is accecabilty well done mam Thank you for porviding apportunity for us to learn what is best

CS

Aug 6, 2020

I really enjoyed everything about this course. I thought the exercises/quizzes were fair and the instructor showed me many things that will serve me well going forward. Great course, great instructor!

筛选依据：

7201 - Introduction to HTML5 的 7225 个评论（共 7,289 个）

创建者 Lewis H

•

May 2, 2016

Very basic

创建者 Rupali s D

•

May 23, 2020

very good

创建者 Ramzi O

•

Oct 6, 2020

generic

创建者 Phan T Đ L

•

Jan 26, 2020

good <3

创建者 Deleted A

•

Sep 4, 2017

Not bad

创建者 ROHITH K B

•

Jul 2, 2020

superb

创建者 Weerachai Y

•

Jun 26, 2020

thanks

创建者 Kevin B J

•

Jun 10, 2021

good

创建者 Deleted A

•

Jul 2, 2020

great

创建者 Albin F

•

May 20, 2020

great

创建者 Kapil R

•

Sep 9, 2017

GOOD.

创建者 Vishal T

•

Sep 3, 2020

good

创建者 K M M H R

•

Jul 23, 2020

Good

创建者 THIPPAVARAM A

•

Jul 15, 2020

Good

创建者 Harshad S

•

Jun 13, 2020

nice

创建者 PAVITHRA H

•

Jun 7, 2020

good

创建者 KOMPELLA S R H

•

May 8, 2020

nice

创建者 ANIKET P

•

Jun 18, 2020

ok

创建者 Raghad M M A

•

Oct 2, 2023

.

创建者 Hardik C

•

Mar 4, 2022

t

创建者 Deleted A

•

Sep 22, 2021

创建者 Lezlie B

•

Feb 7, 2016

F

创建者 Martina W

•

Feb 7, 2016

If there had been a working autograder for the last final project this course would have been worth it somehow.

What does that mean?

- The lectures provided valuable information.

- The quizzes generally made sense (in relation to the lectures).

- Learning how to code wasn't really possible.

Why is that?

- There is only one programming assignment.

- The autograder doesn't give any feedback at all why resp. where things go wrong. That's everything but good style (for software as well as for learning).

- Code snippets can't be tested individually. That's very bad behavior in programming.

- At the end working code that meets the teached rules is marked as wrong. You are lost without any clue.

So probably you can learn something. Unfortunately you can't possibly finish the course with a feeling of success.

创建者 Rae A M G

•

Jun 25, 2024

It needs updated and more structured lessons. The teaching is too all over the place, links broken, outdated sites and modules need to be taught on a better timeline that corresponds to lessons better in a corresponding way, i.e., learning the meaning, explanation, and lists of things before the coding and labwork, tests not after the lesson is finished. When the instructor said she was not a good teacher, she really was correct.

创建者 Jean-Christophe B

•

Oct 1, 2015

The lectures get you through the basics in a clear, understandable way.

But the auto-grader was really a bad idea, that got the lecturer into a lot of trouble for very little gain if any.

It seems to me that peer-reviewed assessments, with proper instructions, are better suited. Apart from being more reliable and less frustrating, I think the learner can really get more out of it.