I thoroughly enjoyed the three part course on "Philosophy, Science and Religion" by the University of Edinburgh. A BIG THANK YOU to those who put these courses together. In this series, the designers wonderfully weaved the relationship between the three apparently diverse disciplines in a cohesive narrative, making ones understanding richer!

O curso é bom, mas tive dificuldade na metodologia e no entendimento da conclusão do curso, pois não consegui entender o que falta para a obtenção do certificado, já que o sistema não mostrava as atividades pendentes...

This was a very difficult course for me due to the nature of the subject. However, Dr. Priest did an excellent job explaining the concepts so that I could follow along. Well done.

A very wide subject for one course. Perhaps it needs more modules or to be split into more courses. But interesting as an intro

Interesting subject, generally well-presented. Some presenters better than others and a bit too much of simple talking heads.

Very good. But it would be very useful and needed to detail more about the arguments of intelligent design.

Achei muito complicado o conceito de depender da avaliação de terceiros (colegas) para ser aprovado.

The course is great. I feel intellectually enriched. Invest in translations and it will be perfect.

A good course that offers some helpful insights that are not immediately obvious to lay people.

Nicely comprehensive and cohesive.

It was great and valuable.

Really good!

The topics were certainly interesting and generally well presented, but of the three linked courses, this is noticeably the weakest and most uneven from a pedagogic point of view. With a third of the material (both in terms of teaching and student participation) being concentrated in one week (week 3), one felt either this section was too long, or that one was being short changed with regard to the other topics.

I also found many discussion topics annoyingly vague, spending more time trying to work out what was one was supposed to talk about than actually talking about it, while most of the quizzes were so ludicrously simple they were a waste of time.

This was the weakest of the three courses in the series. It was unbalanced in the amount of material in the different weeks and one or two of the weeks were very light weight compared with the standard in the other two courses. Could do with a critical review.

When it dips into other fields asides from theology, there is a tendency to speculate on things that are ill understood by the instructor.