Chevron Left
返回到 Prompt Engineering for ChatGPT

学生对 Vanderbilt University 提供的 Prompt Engineering for ChatGPT 的评价和反馈

4.8
7,318 个评分

课程概述

ChatGPT and other large language models are going to be more important in your life and business than your smartphone, if you use them right. ChatGPT can tutor your child in math, generate a meal plan and recipes, write software applications for your business, help you improve your personal cybersecurity, and that is just in the first hour that you use it. This course will teach you how to be an expert user of these generative AI tools. The course will show amazing examples of how you can tap into these generative AI tools' emergent intelligence and reasoning, how you can use them to be more productive day to day, and give you insight into how they work. Large language models respond to instructions and questions posed by users in natural language statements, known as “prompts”. Although large language models will disrupt many fields, most users lack the skills to write effective prompts. Expert users, who understand how to write good prompts, are orders of magnitude more productive and can unlock significantly more creative uses for these tools. This course introduces students to the patterns and approaches for writing effective prompts for large language models. Anyone can take the course and the only required knowledge is basic computer usage skills, such as using a browser and accessing ChatGPT. Students will start with basic prompts and build towards writing sophisticated prompts to solve problems in any domain. By the end of the course, students will have strong prompt engineering skills and be capable of using large language models for a wide range of tasks in their job, business, personal life, and education, such as writing, summarization, game play, planning, simulation, and programming....

热门审阅

WA

Apr 17, 2024

I really loved it, I used chatgpt to understand the videos and I'm glad coursera offers context under the videos, this helped me finish the certificate in not a long time, all it takes is dedication.

RH

Jul 7, 2025

This class is very informative and easy to understand for a beginner like myself. I would recommend it to everyone who is interested to learn how to write better prompt but don't know how to start.

筛选依据:

2251 - Prompt Engineering for ChatGPT 的 2275 个评论(共 2,312 个)

创建者 Ramon V A

Oct 2, 2024

Too long. I would go straight to the point. It would be good a summary cheat-sheet at the end of the course.

创建者 Marcos M

Jul 22, 2025

Cursos deveria ser classificado como basico para pessoas que possuem nenhuma noção de chat ou programação

创建者 Laura B

May 14, 2025

It´s a decent course for absolute beginners. but it´s a bit outdated and not very interactive.

创建者 Roberto K

Dec 4, 2025

Outdated , but the concepts need change it like Framework RICCE something like that

创建者 Justin M

Sep 24, 2025

Having current experience with ChatGPT, this course seems somewhat dated.

创建者 Bobak M

Sep 13, 2024

It was decent, but could have been half the length of time. Too verbose

创建者 Jennifer B

Apr 11, 2025

Some of the content is outdated now as the tech has changed rapidly.

创建者 Sylvie M

Oct 1, 2025

Les vidéos sont trop longues et j'espérais un cours plus poussé.

创建者 Taylor W

May 30, 2025

At this point a lot of the tactics presented are very dated.

创建者 Makdad A M A

Oct 11, 2024

The lesson explanation was long and boring.

创建者 Lucila B R

Aug 13, 2025

I believe it is already obsolete, sorry.

创建者 Michaela S W

Jan 19, 2025

Excellent course, I highly recommend it

创建者 slvn y

Sep 20, 2023

Can be kept more examples and topics

创建者 Harsha H R

Dec 11, 2024

I felt the videos were too long.

创建者 Luciano R

Sep 7, 2024

A bit too basic, and outdated-

创建者 Zhuowei L

Nov 2, 2025

okay but a little boring

创建者 Peter K

Jun 16, 2025

a lot of repetition

创建者 V V

Sep 17, 2025

Slightly out dated

创建者 SHEIK M A

Nov 10, 2024

GOOOD COUSE

创建者 Harshal D

Aug 19, 2024

helpfull

创建者 Neha K

Nov 4, 2023

helpful

创建者 Marvin B

Nov 18, 2025

A lot of this field is people forgetting that the study of Humans exists. As a result, a lot of this is NOT groundbreaking just new for the TECH Professor. This course fails to understand that AI did not create patterns or how they work. It is trying to reinvent the wheel when skilled experts understand why the wheel exists. Your wife was the perfect example. She was the Expert, but because you saw the AI that came out first. Moreover, it is way too long. The Patterns are basically knock-offs of the others. The People change one thing, and name it, and say invented it!! Very Typical. Just so very typical. Again, it is just the Macro level that is missing. The person that says "Hey, are we sure we did not do this before?". Please limit the Modules to actionable input. The Tests are a Joke and an insult. Please provide real tests or nothing. Videos. Omg the Video from the course take a ungodly long time to load. That is a website issue. As both a Lawyer and a Tech expert, to me, all 6 models could be replaced by AI. Why on earth not? Never have a written a review like this for a professor, but again Why would I pick this course over AI?

创建者 Mina M

Sep 22, 2025

Honestly, I was pretty disappointed with this course.. The lecturer tends to over-explain, and the overall structure felt lacking. I often found myself losing focus because the content was overloaded with too much repetition. In my opinion, less is more - streamlined explanations and a clearer structure would make it much easier to follow and actually learn something new.

创建者 stephanie r

Jan 26, 2025

Usually Dr. Jule's courses are very educational. However there was too much information in one course. I would suggest this one course be divided into two courses with more opportunities to use these new prompts. It was very complicated and too much information o learn at once

创建者 Phillip B

Jun 9, 2024

Wow. Disappointing. A niche use case as a "motivating" example by someone who "didn't see this coming" which would indicate a lack of intimate knowledge of the space. Not a thought leader I would invest valuable resources on. Moving on with said resources. ie time and coin