学生对 University of Pennsylvania 提供的 Introduction to Corporate Finance 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
AA
Aug 26, 2017
Great course lectures and pacing! I'd just really like to know the right solutions for the questions i got wrong. That will help sharpen concepts. Great if there's a way to share that. Thanks,Archana
ZZ
Sep 26, 2021
An excellent course overall. I really enjoyed the learning experience and look forward to more courses from Wharton. Special thanks to professor Michael Roberts for providing great value in 1 course.
751 - Introduction to Corporate Finance 的 775 个评论(共 1,236 个)
创建者 Deleted A
•Sep 7, 2021
good
创建者 sajjad s
•Aug 13, 2021
Good
创建者 Lei Q
•Mar 27, 2021
good
创建者 Sourabh K
•Aug 23, 2019
good
创建者 Mohammad S
•May 25, 2016
beau
创建者 Ashish S
•May 14, 2017
nyc
创建者 Ahvaan T
•Sep 11, 2024
na
创建者 Меруерт Т
•Oct 20, 2021
p
创建者 Mugdha K
•Dec 7, 2019
na
创建者 Emmanuel v
•Sep 8, 2016
Re
创建者 PATCHARAYUT C
•Nov 14, 2015
Ok
创建者 Ariel W
•Jul 26, 2018
G
创建者 chirag p j
•Jul 3, 2018
v
创建者 WILL Y
•Jun 6, 2018
t
创建者 Pascal G
•Dec 30, 2017
G
创建者 Eka P
•Dec 29, 2017
G
创建者 Eric T
•Oct 30, 2017
C
创建者 Yoshihiro K
•Jan 1, 2017
E
创建者 Maprang S
•Jul 26, 2020
I don't have a finance background so this course has opened my eyes to the world of corporate finance.
I like how well-thought-out Prof Michael is in designing the course in which all topics flow nicely from week 1 to week 4 and how each concept introduced is interdependent to create a solid financial analysis that people can use to determine the valuation of a project or an investment. However, I'd have rated this course 5 stars, had there been more quizzes, hands-on assignments or final exams that require students to use tools and concepts learned to forecast cash flows and figure out the valuation by themselves. I'm a hands-on learner and although I got 100% from this course I'm not certain I actually understood everything and that I could go out in the real world and start doing some mini financial analysis.
Overall, it's a good introductory course and Prof. Michael's pace of explanation is nice. I'd recommend people who want to know the basics of corporate finance take this course only after Accounting course to understand the terms used in the course better.
创建者 Atul S
•Nov 15, 2015
Very useful. Prof. Roberts explained the concepts very lucidly.
In module-3, 4 I felt as if some lectures were skipped from the original sequence. For e.g. in the end of 4.1 - Return on Investment, the Prof tells that next lecture will be about cost of capital but 4.2 is Sensitivity Analysis. Similarly at the end of 3.3 - Forecasting Free Cash Flow we are told that the next lecture will discuss decision criteria but 4.1 is Return on Investment starts by stating that last lecture discussed sensitivity analysis.
I rechecked the sequence of the lectures from the Coursera so to me it seems some videos are missed somewhere.
Thank you for a wonderful learning experience.
创建者 Stephen K
•Feb 25, 2017
Well taught, practical approach, good example and quiz problems. Overall sort of a minimalist coverage of the topic, but those who don't need an overly in-depth coverage of material will appreciate this. The presented concepts are necessary for basic understanding of business decisions but with this foundation you are prepared to learn much more. The course could benefit from additional real-life examples and concepts from financial decision making. A previous version of the course included discussions about leverage and involvement of financial institutions in project funding. A project with scenario analysis would be enlightening.
创建者 Ashish H S
•Jul 17, 2020
Prof. Roberts starts off really well with the 1st two weeks, covering Time Value of Money, Discounting & Compounding, Shortcuts for Annuities & Perpetuities, APR & EAR, Term Structure and leading into the 3rd week with Decision Making with NPV, IRR, and Payback period. However, I found it a bit complex to understand some of the Tablet case spreadsheet explanations. It, all of a sudden, felt a bit overwhelming relative to the topics covered earlier. The discussions on Sensitivity Analysis could perhaps use simpler examples like those in Week 4 to explain Comparative Statics and Break Even Analysis. A great course, nevertheless.
创建者 Bharani K
•Jan 17, 2018
The videos were well put together. The teaching style is easy to follow. A few tweaks to the course and the quizzes will make it a bit more interesting and challenging. The professor could ask more hypothetical questions during the lectures that regular students in his classes or online discussion forums ask. There could be more quizzes and more questions in each quiz. The very rigid format in answering questions is honestly a bit cumbersome and confusing. Instead multiple choices can be given to take the formatting out of the equation. Lack of active mentorship is a downside that needs to be corrected.
创建者 Malik M
•Dec 14, 2015
I love the course. It gives a great focus on one major focus in finance and that is the DCF/Time Value of Money. The course really serves as a great and very well rounded introduction to the use of that tool in practice, which in turn serves as a platform through which more complex concepts can be built.
My only reservation is that the course in sessions prior had more challenging problem sets. Fortunately, I downloaded them all, but I feel as though maybe a few more assignments wouldn't hurt.
But in the sessions prior, it was overwhelming how much there was! So I understand the rationale!
创建者 Abdulrahman A A A
•May 2, 2022
First of all, I thank you for this course and the videos are clear, but I had a very difficult difficulty in understanding and learning because I did not really study the basics. I got tired a lot. I had not slept for 3 days. I just wanted to understand the problem and the way to solve it. It is useful, but it is very difficult. Companies I was thinking that it is the first session 1, but I was surprised that it is the fourth. I will start again in order to benefit more also. There is no discussion forum in each section, but it is really a useful course in my field. Thank you again.