Often, the instructions for tasks and prompts are incredibly vague - and when "peer-evaluing", the guidelines are similarly vague. I had to submit several attempts just because there was no clarity on what the submitted assignment exactly should look like, and peer evaluators then were unsure which points to give if the rubric was not quantity, but quality. Some more clear structure, more scaffolded practice tasks throughout, and clarity in wording of tasks would help incredibly. Since this is a self-study class, it becomes very discouraging otherwise. Also that I had to wait for weeks to even have enough other people's work I could review was disheartening.

This was an excellent class that provided a great deal of valuable information and then provided opportunities for practicing the skills learned. The peer feedback was helpful as well. I would definitely recommend this class to my colleagues.

Excellent content and instructional delivery. It's a super valuable course.

Very interesting and useful information, the professor was very good.

Excellent content

Best course

Good course.

The assignment is totally unclear poorly worded and simply incomprehensible .