学生对 Google 提供的 Conduct UX Research and Test Early Concepts 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
EA
Feb 6, 2022
The course gives you best practices while doing UX research. With the usability study templates, you are able to summarise all of the participants' key insights and recommendations.
IA
Dec 21, 2023
I found the course very exhaustive. It virtually covered every area of planning research and usability study test. I'm really glad and I feel confident to conduct it now and in the future.
926 - Conduct UX Research and Test Early Concepts 的 950 个评论(共 996 个)
创建者 Samuel S
•Sep 11, 2021
Great course
创建者 Tsatsral B
•Sep 14, 2023
thank you
创建者 Npat P
•Jun 2, 2021
very good
创建者 Ax 6
•Apr 19, 2023
awersome
创建者 Neeraja S
•Jan 10, 2023
thankyou
创建者 Jasper W
•Jun 7, 2023
Amazing
创建者 amit k
•Sep 9, 2022
ausome
创建者 K. R S
•Aug 19, 2024
Good👍
创建者 Sendo T
•Jul 10, 2021
Thanks
创建者 Jessica G
•Feb 4, 2024
Great
创建者 Ansuman k
•Sep 28, 2025
good
创建者 Avishka I K
•Jun 29, 2025
good
创建者 MINAKSHI K
•Sep 19, 2024
Good
创建者 olimjon a
•Sep 14, 2024
good
创建者 Akash S T
•Mar 4, 2024
best
创建者 N S
•Mar 27, 2023
good
创建者 santiago v r
•Jan 29, 2022
Good
创建者 thuy n
•Nov 19, 2021
good
创建者 mustofa
•Apr 6, 2021
ok
创建者 Admaryz A
•Apr 9, 2022
创建者 Rachel F
•Apr 22, 2022
The instruction for the assignments were less clear in this course. I wasn't always sure what needed to be included and how. For all of the graded assignments the instructions for how to submit on the first page were not correct for submitting on the 'my submission' page. I could tell I was not the only one having difficulty because the peer's I reviewed seemed to have the same trouble or had made the same mistakes I did. Also, since the work is peer reviewed if that person reviewing did not understand the assignment they often did not understand how to review my work.
You cannot create a PDF in Miro from Safari without upgrading. This seems to be an accessibility issue.
创建者 Nithin P
•Nov 12, 2021
This course heavily relied on peer feedback for me to gain the most out of it. The theoretical parts were helpful during the assignments, but the instructor was very bland and often seemed disinterested. This isn't me blaming just the instructor. While the course could've used some quizzes in between to help me remember, the main issue would be the pacing. It's a hard task to take interviews needed for this course during COVID times.
But, on a positive note, I really admired how the templates and exemplars were used here and it helped me so much when I was in a spot of bother. This course can be improved though.
3/5
创建者 Nachum G
•Jan 11, 2024
Some of the courses were interesting. but it was mostly Information I remember learning in the early years of high school. and the activities felt tedious at times. The parts about equity don't make much sense either. If I am making an app for mountain climbers attempting to climb Mt Everest I shouldn't make sure to include more transgender and female participants in my just because they were excluded from research in the past. 90% of climbers are male. I should therefore have a 90% male research group in order to get the most accurate information. Lessons like these can harm a company rather than help it.
创建者 Naresh K G
•Jul 29, 2022
1. The instructions imparted, at places do not match the version of FIGMA that we download. Many operations as suggested by instructures or course material coul not be done. IT SHOULD BE CORRECTED.
2. The evaluation process is faulty. Wtin in this course there are two instances where I was asked to resubmit - the grade instruction were wrong. I resubmitted the exact same file and test was cleared.
3. The comments provided are flimsy and not of much use.
创建者 X R
•May 5, 2022
Instructions were not clear enough and not enough resources for learning were offered. For example, I found conducting interviews remotely extremely difficult because we were not taught how to record user's screen movements remotely, and a better solution would have been to offer multiple extra sets of instructions for how to do remote recording.