学生对 University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign 提供的 Pattern Discovery in Data Mining 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
DD
Sep 9, 2017
The first several chapters are very impressive. The last three lessons are a little difficult for first-learners. The illustration are clear and easy to understand.
GL
Jan 17, 2018
Excellent course. Now I have a big picture about pattern discovery and understand some popular algorithm. Also professor points out the direction for further study.
26 - Pattern Discovery in Data Mining 的 50 个评论(共 59 个)
创建者 Eric A S
•Nov 22, 2018
Very interesting and very clearly explained.
创建者 Sanjay K
•May 14, 2020
Awesome content.
创建者 Vaibhav K
•Mar 26, 2018
Nice work plan
创建者 Lu Y
•Feb 5, 2017
very nice!
创建者 Hernán C V
•May 4, 2017
Amazing!
创建者 Valerie P
•Jul 11, 2017
Excel
创建者 MAILE J .
•Sep 11, 2024
well
创建者 Abhishek V K
•May 5, 2020
good
创建者 SAURABH K
•Feb 2, 2019
nice
创建者 Mauricio B V
•Nov 12, 2016
I like this course. Its provides a good base for pattern discovery, with useful high level techniques, this can be used as a starting point.
Something to improve can be incorporating at least one lesson with best practice coding techniques to solve the practical exercises.
创建者 Jose A E H
•May 2, 2017
It's an introductory course to key Pattern Discovery techniques with a comprehensive coverage of important subjects. However, it should be complemented by following the referenced material in order to obtain a wider and more complete picture of the field.
创建者 Hidetake T
•Mar 31, 2020
There are only two programming assignments. One more assignment will gives learners much more confidence I guess. But there are no other similar courses in MOOC. So, worth to take it.
创建者 Clark Y
•Jan 31, 2017
I learned a lot from this lecture. And I believe the lecture is excellent except that if he could become a little bit funny, then it would be perfect. Thanks,
Clark
创建者 Cheng-shuo Y
•Dec 11, 2017
It is a good course but more knowledge are expected to be filled, e.g, some algorithm can be detailed or illustrated with simple-case instantiation.
创建者 邓文豪
•Sep 21, 2020
The course is relatively easy to understand and points out the direction for further study.
创建者 V B
•Aug 9, 2019
Large variety of algorithm presented. Good study material recommendations. Fun assignments.
创建者 Gary C
•Jun 27, 2017
Excellent course that summarizes a very broad and complex topic. Definitely recommend.
创建者 Alexander S
•Dec 16, 2019
Good course. The explanation for the optional programming assignment is very poor.
创建者 Rahul M
•Mar 5, 2017
The course exercises are medium-hard. But the topic coverage is spot on.
创建者 Jaroslaw G
•Nov 11, 2017
OK course, some lectures with too much breadth at the cost of depth
创建者 Tanan K
•Apr 23, 2017
Should be more support in the forum for quiz and assignement
创建者 Lerata M
•May 11, 2021
Sigh, algorithms are not a walk in the park!
创建者 Piotr B
•Aug 3, 2017
Too much material. Not enough real examples.
创建者 Limber
•Nov 28, 2017
I don't really like the Programming Assignment of this course.
I have took over one month to figure it out, and the feedback system don't even provide me any help. The day that I have registered for this course, the coding is still new to me although I have got the training like 1 year thanks to Andrew Ng. And I could only used MATLAB/Octave or Python to solve the quiz. I have tried to use MATLAB to finished this course, but I failed many times. Finally, I have decided to use Python to solve this PA, and the algorithm is still hard for me to complete, so I used the python tool that with the algorithm in it and fix a little.
I believe that this course is a really good course, and Jiawei Han is a real kind person. BUT even for some other courses, we got a startup(like Andrew Ng's Machine Learning Course and Koller's PGM).
However, besides the PA, the rest of the course is really worth taking. I read the books for times and figured out that it indeed help! Though, it is hard for a new student. You should have to dive deep into the course which you should read more about this subject. Jiawei Han's work is only a startup.
Thank you very much.
创建者 To P H
•May 8, 2019
Course content too dense with many lectures serve as mere summary of advanced papers with little explanantion of technical terms. Too much mention of advanced topics with not enough coverage and depth for each topic
There are not many examples of the algorithm/of a case that can be solved using an algorithm. Little math is involved
Course should be longer (6 weeks) with longer lectures with more examples and exercises
This makes the content quick to be forgotten.