The program is successful and well prepared. However, adding more good practices for different sectors from the world may be better to understand the topics. Thank you.

Professor Ricardo was a thorough, earnest, and truly remarkably lucid teacher. Highly recommended.

Very imformitive, and well balanced. Gives you the tools to make your own decisions.

Apparently is the only course that mention carbon markets

Lack of relevant knowledge, this professional course is very difficult for me. Throughout a long and hard time, I am glad that I had been persisted and completed it.

Great course, but it's a little bit harder than expect for me which don't have a economy background.

Well organized, informative and very educative

Prof. Rebonato keeps being fantastic !

than you

perfect

It is a specialist course about intricacies of climate change economics, models for cost abatement and social discounting and energy policies. It is in-depth ,rigorous and challenging course. I highly recommend it to Economists and Sustainable Finance Professionals.

This course is an overview approaching economic model to try to understand approach on the CO2 and GHG from politic, governmental, tax point of view using some on hands elements. System are complicated if approached through mathematics, becasue of calculation but a multiple systems has to be considered to foreseen a real future scenario. too many variables, externatilities but as baseline rate and social discount to try to explain what to do now or postpone tomorrow. As usual some economic model are contradictory so maybe are trying to explain one scenario and at the end they explain another one, so counter-logical. Anyway a start to go in depth to argue based on economics.

Ayudaría bastante el doblaje al español de los videos teniendo en cuenta que tiene terminología técnica y por el numero de videos. Por otro lado podría tener una dinámica diferente ya que se torna bastante monótono

Good course. I learned a lot.

However, there is a great emphasis on mathematics. Sometimes that's a bit exaggerated in my opinion .

Week 1 is basic knowledge, explained well.

Weeks 2 and 3 explain how a house of cards is built, but not why it's not a house of cards.

Weeks 4 & 5 are of uneven quality but overal useful because providing valuable links to reliable resources.

Overall I think the course is too superficial. A lot of equations threw there and there is no a real case study. NPV applied to a real case? no etc

The course is too theoretical and I don't think it gives you the base to calculate real investment cases.