学生对 Stanford University 提供的 Evaluations of AI Applications in Healthcare 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
JW
Apr 7, 2022
This course was really valuable for linking and embedding my knowledge gained by reading FDA guidance documents and knowledge sharing from my Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs colleagues
GL
Mar 5, 2021
This is a holistic course giving all perspectives and knowledge on the different aspects of evaluating all kind of AI driven solutions in healthcare. A must do for all healthcare Managers.
51 - Evaluations of AI Applications in Healthcare 的 69 个评论(共 69 个)
创建者 Parisa a
•Jul 17, 2024
good
创建者 Arvind X
•Apr 19, 2025
The course content is exceptional. Spot on and sufficiently detailed to provide complete clarity on how to evaluate AI applications in Healthcare. The additional optional module with updates is a welcome surprise. Thanks for that. One observation - and the reason for 4 stars. In the final exam, one question was wrong and despite repeated efforts and selecting all the options in turn, the LMS returned the answer as incorrect. As a result the score remained at 96% instead of 100% . The question is as below. All four of them are important settings as explained in the training video "Settings". The last option should be "None of the above" so the question can be answered correctly. 12. Which of the following is not an important setting in AI development? Academics Industry Government Philanthropy All of the above
创建者 Tajan K
•Dec 31, 2020
This course contains an extraordinary amount of considerations and information critical to the process of development and deployment of AI Applications in Healthcare. The topics include Evaluation Frameworks, Deployment Methodologies, Regulatory considerations, key considerations of fairness and bias in AI Applications, and Ethical considerations in AI. In many ways, any organization that intends to or is in the process of developing AI Applications should take these topics into consideration even before development begins. The material provided includes references to helpful frameworks and guidelines, which if used in the initial stages of the life cycle of an AI Application, would probably help reduce lead time, as also enable the deployment usage of the application in actual healthcare settings.
创建者 Benjamin E
•Jul 24, 2021
An imporatnt topic area, but a little hard to digest as it uses a lot of terminology and frameworks which are not necessarily well defined. I think it would benefit from some simplification into principles and language that are more relatable, still cross referenced to the technical/regulator terminology.
创建者 Ee V T
•Jul 6, 2024
Speaker appears to be reading off a prompter, and sometimes loses track of the sentence. Also links to articles require subscription, which limits use. However content is amazing, so much to learn and think about.
创建者 Natalia K
•Aug 25, 2021
There are several mistakes in the final exam questions. Check back. In terms of meaning, you can guess about the correct answer, but you need to fix it.
创建者 Javier B
•Oct 13, 2024
DEMASIADO TIEMPO HABLANDO DE SESGO, JUSTICIA Y EQUIDAD. EL RESTO PERFECTO.
创建者 Pierre J
•Jul 10, 2022
Useful content, but there is a lot of repetition early in the course.
创建者 Shiraz T
•Dec 24, 2023
good source of information
创建者 Richard J
•Apr 7, 2021
Excellent
创建者 Ines V
•Mar 31, 2025
I found the subject matter to be both relevant and insightful; however, the overall delivery of the content left room for improvement. The presenter's monotone and somewhat disengaging speaking style made it challenging to maintain focus throughout the session, often necessitating multiple reviews of the material. Enhancing the delivery with more dynamic presentation techniques and interactive elements could significantly improve comprehension and engagement. I appreciate the effort behind the curriculum and believe that refining the presentation style will further enrich the learning experience.
创建者 zoi k
•Nov 15, 2023
the content was really interesting, but it seemed it the way it was given was not interactive, it was just like "reading slides" and the videos had flaws at some points (glitches). Not a good impression when the last chapter was just text, not including videos
创建者 Petra H
•Jan 15, 2024
Material was useful and described in depth. The English text transcription of the presentation however contained many errors and poor grammar, making the transcript confusing at times.
创建者 Yuanqin M
•Jan 21, 2021
too many theories but no practica examples or exercises
创建者 MANIK S
•Aug 11, 2025
too theoretical
创建者 Francesca M B
•Jan 8, 2022
Very US focused
创建者 Julian M H
•Sep 14, 2024
Repetion of the same information over and over. Lecturer only reads information. Lack of Reflection.
创建者 Trinh D D ( H
•Jul 14, 2023
very disappointed with week 7
创建者 Jamuna P
•Sep 17, 2025
Video not loading.