学生对 The University of Melbourne 提供的 The Language and Tools of Financial Analysis 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
JR
May 18, 2020
Really insightful instruction on the basics of accounting and finance! I would highly recommend this course to anyone looking to begin learning about financial analysis. No prior experience is needed.
GK
Jun 17, 2021
The insctructor performs excellent presentations. I am also very satisfied with the course resources. The topics gave me a good overview on the basics. Highly recommended for beginners.
226 - The Language and Tools of Financial Analysis 的 244 个评论（共 244 个）
创建者 Majid A
•Mar 28, 2016
Good introduction!
创建者 Abi 3
•Jun 17, 2016
Very good course!
创建者 Azimjon U
•Jan 18, 2016
very good course
创建者 aoun a
•Jul 18, 2016
Great Course.
创建者 Abdirisak J
•Apr 28, 2017
I have lear
创建者 Asha D
•Mar 21, 2022
good
创建者 RAGSHANA A
•Jan 31, 2021
well
创建者 AJITH K B
•May 26, 2020
Good
创建者 Dustin C
•Nov 16, 2020
The course is alright if you are a very independent self-learner. I found the presentation to be very boring. It reminded me of the professors who simply stood motionless in from of the class and read the powerpoint and book word for word in a mono tone voice. My suggestion is to maybe find someone who is a bit more animated to present. There is a ton of good content and the real world application does appear in the final peer reviewed project. However, I found the prompt to be extremely confusing and so did my other fellow learners. The question asked to "interpret and comment" a graph of financial ratio's. Many of the submissions I reviewed were confused in the same way that I was. I figured out eventually that I was meant to explain the data as a financial analyst would to an executive, but I saw that 2 out of 3 of the assessments that I graded simply listed the calculation results with no interpretation or comment. I can see how this would be confusing language and it should be made more clear.
创建者 Sam F (
•Jun 14, 2020
The course is good but assignment has error and if someone didn't pass the assignment in 3 attempts then you have to wait for 360 hrs. The result of that learners/students times wasted a lot to pass the course.
创建者 YJ L
•Feb 6, 2016
Assignment is only allowed for students who purchased the course. I don't think this is a way to encourage learning.
创建者 Steph
•Mar 27, 2017
Good for learning how to calculate ratios and NPV. The course material doesn't explain the interpretation o
创建者 Zhitao L
•Dec 28, 2015
Just for fresh beginner in this topic
创建者 Vaishnavi B
•Jun 19, 2020
The problem is just the last Peer Gradeded Quiz.
创建者 Aditya P
•Jan 4, 2016
More in-depth analysis would have been amazing.
创建者 Jaiwant N A
•Mar 10, 2016
Average!
创建者 Bjarne R
•Apr 14, 2021
Paul Kofmans accent is intolerable - If the course should work he would have to stop saying "F" everytime he should say "V" - iI´s highly disturbing constanstantly hearing "fan" instead "van", "infestors" instead of "investors" etc.
创建者 Harsh T
•Sep 12, 2023
I completed the course and got the certificate
as well, still it charged me extra 45 euros. Coursera sucks
创建者 dani n
•Apr 19, 2023
👎