学生对 IBM 提供的 Fundamentals of AI Agents Using RAG and LangChain 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
KC
Sep 29, 2025
Interesting, engaging, with easy to follow python code samples and explanations. Nice AI coach can help you to repeat the material or explain complex ideas. Enjoyable experience :)
WD
Aug 23, 2025
Descriptive Course. I think some Labs need to update to latest libraries because some functions getting failed or generate warnings
26 - Fundamentals of AI Agents Using RAG and LangChain 的 36 个评论(共 36 个)
创建者 Vinod k P
•Sep 22, 2025
Lot to learn, but expected little more briefly.
创建者 T. F
•May 7, 2025
I wish there was more coding questions
创建者 Laxman G
•Aug 28, 2024
A glossary would be useful.
创建者 Anil P
•Nov 18, 2025
Good leaning model for AI
创建者 Gujjula R
•Nov 7, 2025
Good
创建者 Kiranbabu B
•Oct 15, 2025
good
创建者 Bevan J
•Nov 30, 2024
I think there are some issues with the tests - a number of times I feel the answers are either incorrect or the questions are poorly worded so as to be ambiguous. For example: "In agents, a language model is used as a reasoning engine to determine which of the following actions?" - LangChain agents use only Python code for building applications - Language model - Task manager - Data loader From the videos/summary, agents are clearly communicated as Task manager (see below). Additionally, the wording 'In agents' feels like it is referring to a field or domain of specialization which was never introduced; the concept of an agent as an object was taught. Furthermore, the grammar of the question and answers don't align - by asking for 'actions' you are asking for a verb, but all of the answers are nouns. " - Agents in LangChain are dynamic systems where a language model determines and sequences actions, such as predefined chains. - Agents integrate with tools such as search engines, databases, and websites to fulfill user requests. " Furthermore, an LLM by definition cannot be referred to as a reasoning engine as it is probabilistic by its very nature. The ability to reason (or produce reasoned responses) is not the same as a reasoning engine, which is something like a calculator that is deterministic and based on fundamental axioms.
创建者 Ranjeet T
•Jul 28, 2025
great
创建者 Marco I (
•Aug 4, 2025
Los videos describen las cosas muy rápido y los exámenes hacen preguntas que poco se entienden con los temas vistos,.
创建者 William E
•Jul 31, 2025
Labs didn't work properly. Which took up a great portion of the course. But the rest outside that was good.
创建者 Ankush B
•Sep 13, 2025
The audio is worst and seems he is rushing to teach. not able to understand.