Chevron Left
返回到 The Global Financial Crisis

学生对 Yale University 提供的 The Global Financial Crisis 的评价和反馈

4.8
2,330 个评分

课程概述

Former U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Timothy F. Geithner and Professor Andrew Metrick survey the causes, events, policy responses, and aftermath of the recent global financial crisis....

热门审阅

KK

Jul 17, 2017

this cause has corrected some misconceptions that i had during my work as a bank examiner.. it will assist me in my current role as a risk manager of a significant important financial institution

CV

Jan 10, 2017

Excellent course. A real privilege to have this kind of instructors. Exceptional opportunity to receive information directly from one of the main protagonists of the event.

筛选依据:

451 - The Global Financial Crisis 的 471 个评论(共 471 个)

创建者 Tor-Oskar K

Aug 31, 2017

Provides a good overview without going too much into the details

创建者 Rey V

Jan 15, 2016

A course worthy of learning and filled with valuable information

创建者 Huub V

Dec 29, 2015

Provides insights in macro economic decisions based on the actua

创建者 Diamond H

Apr 19, 2016

Learned quite a lot! The course was structured very good.

创建者 Yanliang X

Mar 17, 2020

a proper way to understand GFC happened in US and UN.

创建者 Michael C

Dec 10, 2015

Good fundamental summary of the GFC. Worth the time.

创建者 Rohit R

Nov 1, 2016

Really worthy for a financial individual.

创建者 Guilherme G

Jul 24, 2019

Too many tests, but very good content.

创建者 Somanshu M

Nov 25, 2017

Great insight for the financial crisis

创建者 Cardo M

Jan 22, 2016

very much enjoyed the course.

创建者 Sim R

Jul 27, 2020

Learn a great deal!

创建者 JR C

Dec 24, 2016

me interesa mucho

创建者 Nikhilesh M

Sep 24, 2021

good content

创建者 afif p

Aug 5, 2020

nice

创建者 gaocen

Jul 4, 2016

c

创建者 Gonçalo S

Dec 10, 2015

In short, I am somewhat disappointed with the course overall. Of course both speakers have amazing experiences and that is valuable in itself but I do believe the structure of the lectures is not envolving as it should be. It seems that the basic rationale is being 'fired' in a not so much 'educative fashion'. Still there is much to learn from these contents.

创建者 Jackob R

Sep 22, 2022

very good.

创建者 Fred V

Dec 4, 2020

This course tells a lot about the future historiography of the 2007 crisis. However, there is a lot about factual details, but a deafening silence about the shortcomings of the US and international financial systems. Notably about consumer protection in the US, and lack thereof. Also notably about the shortcomings of the Basel II Accord.

As for the discussion forum: it is mentored and moderated in the 'Agitprop' style (Agitprop: Ministry of Agitation and Propaganda, 'communication' organ of the North Korea State). It is not geared as a complement of the lectures or a discussion forum, but as a way to push people into thinking whatever, in a directive, patronising and childish way.

创建者 Tom B

Jan 7, 2016

Some good information but very much a political course, not much of an economics course. Stating, as if it is a given, late in the course, that there are times when it is okay to introduce a moral hazard. Erroneously defining fiat money early in the course. Stating, again as if it were a given, that deficit spending is naturally the right answer to a crisis. When politicians and their pawns develop a course should we be surprised that the answer is always more government intervention? Oh, if only we had more tools to stop this, never realizing their role in creating the crisis.

创建者 Jonathan G

Mar 14, 2018

interesting course. However it dosen't take 11 modules to explain it. This was BORING AS HELL! here is how you solve the financial crisis: First, only buy what you need. Second make your own jobs if you cannot find one. Find a skill you are good at and make that your job. Third, paper money is going to be worthless soon anyway so either use bartering or some other form of currency. This will probably happen pretty soon. If one currency collapses another form of currency takes its place.

创建者 Kaiquan M

Feb 3, 2016

There was no engagement between the course instructors and students at all. It felt like students were running the whole show and discussion forums.