Very helpful

Very helpful!

Great course

great course

دورة ممتازة

Great...!!!

Thank you

Great!

ممتاز

Done

Good

While I have learned from this course, I'm afraid that I have to agree with some of the reviews: its design could stand to be further enhanced—something of an irony, given that it deals with instructional design.

The videos are far too long and too unvaried to be engaging or memorable. The "talking head" format of the videos adds little value; I suspect that providing the lessons in the form of slide presentations that students could work through on their own would have been just as, if not more, effective. Creating smaller chunks of content would also make everything more manageable.

With regard to the assessments, I wish that I could have gotten feedback from the instructors on the assignments. While I understand the place of peer feedback in all kinds of learning, the fact of the matter is that neither my peers nor I are the subject-matter experts. Moreover, I found the quizzes a bit frustrating, because they contemplate only very thin slices of the substantial content that students are expected to have thoroughly digested beforehand.

Finally, the videos make reference to a Master Track Certificate, which I understand can no longer be earned by taking this particular course. In that sense, the videos are outdated.

I really appreciated the course. It was well organized, with solid information. However, leaving one of the essay assignments to be graded by one person, rather than multiple people to find an average score, might need to be fixed - as that one person might have mis-read or mis-understood the essay. I have taken several other Coursera courses, and this is the first course where one other student can determine 20% of the grade, rather than having multiple peer graders and finding an average.

Also, some of the quiz questions are vaguely worded. Some quiz questions are unnecessarily complex and unevenly loaded (e.g. loading a question with five or nine different choices and asking "select all that apply" so that even if four or eight correct responses are chosen, the entire question is marked incorrect because of one out of nine choices) versus questions that have the simple choice of false or true.

I took this course to begin familiarizing myself to the basic premises of Instructional Design, as it's a field I'm looking to move into. The course was packed with a ton of useful information; however, the presentations left much to be desired. With one or two exceptions toward the end of the course, most of the lectures were dry and boring. I actually started dozing off a couple of times because of the flat and monotone delivery from the lecturers. I also laughed out loud when one lecture proposed using creativity and outside-the-box thinking in course development, considering this particular course used very few creative elements. I recommend the course if you want to learn some basic theory and foundational concepts for ID. Just know that it's not particularly fun, lively, or stimulating and it can be a slog to get through.

Overall, the course helped me feel more confident in my knowledge of and abilities as I am beginning to enter this field of work.

My only two complaints are about some of the quiz questions and about the time frame corresponding to the readings. For the quiz questions, there was one in week 4 that wasn't even a question (the one about matching learning goal statements to domains of learning), so it wasn't exactly clear what I was supposed to do. One the whole, I got more out of the writing exercises than the quiz questions, and I think these should be used more. For the reading time frames, it always took me much more than 10 minutes to do these.

Very interesting course. Working in instructional design, but having no formal training, it was nice to learn the names and pedagogy behind what I work on daily. That being said - there were a few lectures that I found to be a bit disorganized and jumped around a little too much to fully grasp the first time listening/reading. Also, I think more attention should be paid to the PowerPoints and visual aides used: Different color schemes for different topics/modules, spacing to allow learners to anticipate when we were finishing with a slide, and again, certain infographics weren't presented in a logical sequence.

Excellent intro into Instructional Design. The videos are well produced and the content is perfect for those looking to get into or expand their knowledge in the foundations. This course focuses on the first stage of instructional design, with much focus on history and context as to why this is a growing field. I do wish the content was downloadable since the slides are super helpful especially for taking notes and went beyond analysis of the learner and learner objectives into training content creation. Lastly, I wish there was more information on which classes would be a great next step on Coursera.

This course is very good overall. I found this, my first course in instructional design (ID), doable after many hours of reading, listening to videos, googling, and You-Tubing (and repeating). I learned quite a bit about the history of ID, learning theories, styles, and domains, the various ID Models and analyses, and about writing goals and objectives. I liked the organization of the course and the teaching methods. I also liked the projects but didn't care much for the grading process for these writing assignments---peer grading is extremely subjective---but it worked out okay.

Good introduction to the Instructional Design field... BUT ironically, for an online class about instructional design, I don't think it's efficiently designed : quizzes don't allow to see answers which doesn't leave room for more learning, one of the instructors made me want to fall asleep with his monotonous voice and the way he would just name abstract concepts without any clear explanation, and in general the lack of real-life references to bring theory and practice together.

I did learn a lot but I was expecting more!

As a newcomer to Instructional Design, I got a long drink from the firehose of this field. It is vast. I think the course did a reasonable job of conveying the concepts. But the quizzes, though convenient for a MOOC, are easily gamed and not the best way to help learners gain mastery of the course materials. Getting feedback on written assignments exclusively from student peers is not that helpful and most likely a poor substitute for the expertise of certified Instructional Design professors.

It was a good course. Content is interesting for anyone who wants to start understanding how IDs work and what their concerns are. I did not like the long videos. I also didn't like the teachers with a monotonic tone of voice, same position, same layout, same colors on slides ... In this sense, video typescripts were very helpful. Quiz 3 deserves a review, there are questions that can be better elaborated. I appreciate the opportunity offered by UofI.

The course provided a clear overview of the field of ID. The learning material wall well-organized and assignments served the purpose of gauging learner comprehension of the content. The additional readings were very insightful. One thing that could have been better is the way quizzes were phrased. The ambiguous phrasing of some questions/distracters was off-putting, especially this being an ID course.

Very thorough course that provides an excellent foundation in Instructional Design. I did not give 5 stars because the assessment quizzes need to be modified to capture requisite understanding of content in a more holistic way. However, the written assignments and peer reviews are an excellent assessment design and helpful tools for students to engage with each other's perspectives.