I really liked the videos and the final project; however, the quizzes included questions about information that wasn’t explained in the videos.

this is a good course, but some quiz contains questions that not even covered in the course i hope epic will change that!

Some questions on the quizzes aren't really discussed in the videos, kind of requiring you to do your own research.

All the multiple-choice quizzes have option A as the answer. Please make the multiple choices a bit more hard.

Tests need some adjustment since some questions are on material that was not covered.

All the tests answers are (A). Feels a little lazy from a course design perspective.

Pretty basic stuff parts about GDD structure could be more detailed.

Some assignments need more time to complete

The videos were helpful to watch, but I found the practice assignments at the end of the modules had nothing to do with the video preceding them. The expectations for the final game design document were unclear, with the individual sections asking for specific and detailed work that would take a team months to complete, but the final document summary suggesting it didn't need to be so complex. I assume the rubric/quiz for the individual game design document sections was AI generated because of this, which made it frustrating to figure out what was expected of me.

I am currently taking the course. It has a few issues, namely, the quizzes involved. If you want to get a decent grade, watch all the other videos first—I mean all of them, even if they are past where the quiz takes place. Most of the questions are not given answers anywhere in the course. It has good information about certain aspects but does not go into detail about certain terms, or processes, or provide many examples. This might encourage individual research if the terms were introduced within the lessons or if extra reading was involved.

The content was OK, but the assessments were terrible. Some questions would appear way too early, so you would never have the answer and would just have to retry the quiz hoping to get random questions that matched the current module - e.g. questions where the answer is in module 4 would show up in module 1.

Even though I really enjoy the course it was just too hard to follow instructor, with addition of fab, I can't follow instructor, because megascans is in fab now or whatever. Instructor is great but if it is official course from Epic Games they should realize that it should be up to date

Ok video presentations, poor evaluation quizzes and grading (requiring knowledge not presented in the course and not reinforcing what was presented), the prompt to make you create a complete GDD and the community around it are the only saving graces.

Disappointingly short (maybe 16 minutes each module) for a paid, and moreover, official course. Nothing but respect for the instructors but to the team who designed the course: it needs a serious redisign

The complexity of the final test is somethign...

The quizzes are broken.

es puro concepto en si ,no te enseñan a desarrollar un videojuego solo te califican si sabes los conceptos de juego y ellos lo revisan,califico mal por que es de paga despues de un semana,no se si la funcion sea conseguir un trabajo con ellos,pero si quiero aprender a desarrollar desde 0 al menos deberian cambiar el nombre del curso

Quizzes are upsetting and frustrating. Videos are good and provide valuable information. But what gets me off this specialization is quizzes. It's not okay to have some simple information in videos and then drop 5-10 completely uncovered abbreviations in the quiz, it provides some "go guess" style.

While the content was alright, the prepared questionairs and hand in forms are incorrect or uncomplete. some missing upload fields, sometimes answers simply being wrong, making an achieval of 100% without actually answering with an incorrect answer impossible.

Course video concepts are good. However all the work material is AI written, does not encourage thinkin, pulls from outside sources that wasnt in the material provided.

P