学生对 Duke University 提供的 Java Programming: Principles of Software Design 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
OI
Aug 7, 2019
My confidence level in Java programming has grown significantly since completing this specialisation. It gave me the necessary knowledge and practice I need to take up a role as a software engineer.
VA
May 3, 2020
Well designed and well structured with the packages, resources, programming exercises and practice quiz. I appreciate the team's hard work in delivering good knowledge on the subject efficiently.
176 - Java Programming: Principles of Software Design 的 200 个评论(共 253 个)
创建者 Yasmeen G
•Nov 2, 2016
GREAAAT♥♥
创建者 Hamid S
•Aug 8, 2016
Excellent
创建者 Sukhvir S
•Oct 16, 2020
Good One
创建者 Vitalii V
•Apr 12, 2020
GREAT!!!
创建者 Obada A
•Jul 3, 2017
tank you
创建者 Shikha T
•Mar 10, 2022
Awesome
创建者 Dr. S N B
•Jul 5, 2021
Awesome
创建者 A.M.CHAMINDA S B A
•Dec 22, 2020
so good
创建者 MR. G L
•Jul 16, 2020
amazing
创建者 Aditya
•May 30, 2019
SuperB!
创建者 Александр В
•Jan 31, 2019
great!
创建者 Arislan M
•Feb 22, 2016
Great!
创建者 victor m
•Sep 1, 2022
good
创建者 Boya J
•Sep 5, 2022
good
创建者 S K
•Nov 28, 2020
good
创建者 Md A H
•Oct 19, 2020
Good
创建者 Rahul S
•Oct 6, 2020
Good
创建者 Rishi P
•Aug 9, 2020
good
创建者 hakan33
•Apr 20, 2017
best
创建者 Abdelrhman B
•Nov 26, 2019
1
创建者 Bryan Y
•Jan 17, 2017
Pacing of this course was all over.
Interface and Abstract classes were introduced and the material and lessons were easy to follow. Sorting using bubble sort, caparable, and comparator operators were also easy to follow. The final week presented topics on exception and try/catch/finally, but provided no practical programs for a student to write to ensure the topics were understood.
The problem was in week 3. N-Grams meant to teach some very important concepts about Markov and predictive text, but failed somewhat since the quizes were not clear and the grading a bit harsh. In the quizes, problems were presented and you either had the right output or you did not. There was no checks available that allowed a student to figure out why code produced the wrong output. In other modules (and courses in this series), input was provided and expected out based on the input was provided to verify code was working correctly. Not in section 3 - you wrote the code, took the quiz, and if you got the answer wrong were left scratching your head as to why, since there were really no means to check.
Don't mistake this feedback as saying the course was bad - it was actually quite good. If the course material for week 3 is updated to include clearer instructions and some better checks to ensure code is working correctly then I will change my review from a four star (it's more 3.5 than 4) to a five star.
创建者 Четверухин А А
•Jan 10, 2019
Nice course which logically ends the series of four. Finally explains why different duke.edu libraries were used as well as BlueJ, which seemed to be strange choise at the beginning. I've finally understood why interfaces and abstract classes are important and how to use it. I decrease the mark to 4 only due to week 3 tests unclarity around hashmap - I've never worked it out how to get to the test results on hashmap size - it was working fine on small samples, but not matching the answers which were in the quiz for the big files which took a lot of time from me and didn't bring satisfaction.
创建者 Andrii L
•Dec 26, 2019
Generally, I like this course. The tasks are very interesting and require to spend some time on them. But what I don't like is IDE that teachers use in this course. I also think that whole week 3 should be redesigned, especially requirements, they are not very readable. You should add some testing utility or some cases to test and verify student output with teachers.
创建者 William G
•Oct 28, 2020
There are some super cool concepts in here, but one of the modules in this course (module 3) was messy. Even the instructors have agreed that some lectures should be improved upon. That module was so messy that although I managed to finish, I felt like I need to relearn the concepts entirely somewhere else.
创建者 Aarya P
•Aug 15, 2020
A really nice experience learning the exact use of the object oriented style of programming. Different concepts like abstraction and interface are well taught. A little bit improvement can be done in the assignment section otherwise its great and also week 4 could be a little more interesting.