I found the presenters spoke a little too slowly and were difficult to stay engaged with, so I mostly resorted to reading the transcripts afterwards (or sometimes alone with the video). Lot's of talk about various levels of various topics that is probably going to be hard to retain.

course was very heavy on standards and technical definitions. It could benefit from practical examples and bringing the concept to life vs. simply listing off all of the components of different layered heirarchies of technical concepts.

The course gives good information. But i feel like the title is misleading. This feels more like a course for manufacturing and mechanical engineers than the wholistic concept of model based systems engineering.

While thorough, the course would have benefitted from concrete examples of MBSE implementations. The NIST scales could have been included as a reference without building an entire week's lesson around them.

El curso en líneas generales está bien orientado, pero hay muchos enlaces que no funcionan correctamente.

En el certificado final no aparece el nombre del alumno.

It was more theoretical and less practical.I expected more of a real-time approach that can broaden my understanding MBSE. I was very basic.

Good course, first 3 module deals with the concept of system engineering las 2 modules are mostly focusses of product manufacturing.

Course is interesting for really new comer on the field and is orientated on design and manufacturing process.

Gives a basic overview to concept of MBSE. Widens thought horizon of this topic

Lesson 4 was rough, there was a lot of talking and no visual aids in the video.

Needed projects this course was too much information with no way to apply it.

the course was not too engaging, some information was being repeated

To less information about SysML and Effect Chains

a bit boring but has good blend of knowledge

Unfortunately MBSE wasn't the main Topic...

Useful introduction to the concept of MBSE

molto teorico

Ok

The course in a standalone format, outside of the specialization, has a few moments which are quite difficult to understand as they refer to previous courses of the specialization.

The quizzes are not very well done as they expect you to fill in the exact same word that the lecturer used (even when it's a verb or a noun) and often those are mentioned once and not even displayed on the slides. On a couple of occasions, I had to rewatch the videos multiple times to find the specific word the instructor used. An example would be that "MES system" is correct but "MES systems" is not wrong even though both would fit grammatically in the quiz sentence.

The videos merely consist of the professor citing lists of definitions form several standards and do not contain practical examples. The scope of MBE is purely on designing and building 'simple' parts of systems and the cyber-physical element (how to handle software in complex systems) is not discussed anywhere. A significant emphasis lays on executing an MBE Self-Assessment (something most SE will never perform).

Thanks for providing the basic introduction into the MBSE. Some suggestions for further improvement: 1. Proper slides to support structured learning. Simply video introduction didn't help a lot to understand such a complex topic. 2. Proper hand-out to follow up more easily. 3. Quiz only focused on the literal definitions, quiz/exercise to support deeper understanding could be more helpful.

The transcripts of the guest lecturer should be divided into more paragraphs.

In the 2nd and 4th assignment the answers to some of the questions are exactly the same as depicted or explained in the video but in the assignment it shows that the answer is wrong.

Very high level introduction to the concept of MBE not MBSE specifically. Acronyms and concepts mixed throughout and poorly structured at times. No details just referencing commercial websites or old barely readable papers.

The course teaching some technical term but there are no exercises or any concepts that are learned during it. Matlab, Simulink and Ansys have also not being used. I would not say that this would be useful when I am working.