Good course

excellent

Excellent

good

good

GOOD

GOOD

good

good

e

5

Very interesting topic. However I feel that most questions in the assessments are a bit off-topic. Also, course material would benefit from a few updates, since a lot of things have changed in the last few years. The part on pharmaco-economics was disappointing and would benefit from more and better material. The first part on "research" was mostly a discussion pushed by an author of a paper in order to talk about their own research. While reading a research paper is always a good exercise, this felt particularly forced, and the questions related to that part had no sense.

Enjoyable course. Sometimes the questions seemed extra specific and difficult, like they were not quite covered by the videos. Also, sometimes the lecturers are a little hard to understand. Overall, though, I very much enjoyed the course, learning about precision medicine--its goals and benefits and challenges and ways of implementation.

The course instructional material was fantastic. The exam questions however, were mixed from 2-3 different module and did not represent each module at a time (final examination of each module). The questions needs to be reviewed again by the instructors

I particularly didn't like the evaluation system. Compared to other courses, you barely get feedback on evualtions. Even though the content is interesting, I would've liked more multimedia content rather that just people talking on and on.

It gave me an insight into practical implementation of precision medicine from different perspectives. It highlighted the importance of genetics in the clinical practice from treatment to prevention of disease using potential biomarkers.

The course is really interesting and useful. Thank you very much.

I believe it is necessary to improve or revise the quality of the evaluations since some questions present mistakes or appear before the class is presented.

The course covered the basic and advanced techniques in the current field of PM and gave real life case scenarios which helps relate the topic well. The scientific content is useful and literature quoted is very apt.

Thanks to that who creators of this course, to all speakers. Thanks for the chance to listen to it for free.

Lectures were interesting and informative, but sometimes it was difficult to understand material.

Very interesting course. Many topics very well organized. Reccomended for all people who want to go deep inside this new paradigm in medicine

The teaching could have been more interactive and more fun. it got a bit monotonous sometimes, but otherwise it was a great course.

It's a very comprehensive course. thank you to all the instructors and participants involved in making of this course.

very interesting course

Thank you

I think this course does a good job in trying to be comprehensive and provide some amount of coverage for many relevant topics to genomics in medicine (or "precision" medicine).

If I have a chance to revise my review, then I might change this to be 4 stars instead of 3 stars.

However, my reasoning for giving 3 stars is follows:

- There are a number of typos. I also have a tendency to make typos, and I reported many (but not all) of what I noticed through the system to report issues. So, if those are fixed, then I hope that helps future students.

- While I can understand the motivation to avoid inflating grades by re-taking quizzes too many times, there was a fairly large number of questions where I was not sure why I did not get the 100% graded option. To be fair, this was not so bad that I risked not passing the class. However, I don't think it was ideal for learning purposes.

- I took the course both to refine my knowledge as well as try out courses to potentially recommend to others (where I am a Bioinformatics Specialist working in genomics research for my main job). If there was only 1 or 2 points where I was not sure if I agreed with the conclusion, then I could try having a discussion to either see what I misunderstood or possibly describe the issue better (or both). However, I think there was a noticeable amount of time when I was not sure if I completely agreed, and the difficulty in finding the "correct" answers when multiple options were provided per question made that harder. To be fair, I definitely agreed with conclusions much more than I disagreed with conclusions, and I think many core concepts were covered well. However, at the moment, I think I would first like to try out some additional courses before returning for additional discussions (and then possibly revising my review, if that is possible).