学生对 University of London 提供的 Probability and Statistics: To p or not to p? 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
TS
Apr 30, 2020
I would like to thank Dr. James Abdey for his wonderful explanation of probability and statistics in a short time. I definitely learnt many things which I can make use in my further courses. Thank you
RC
Sep 19, 2024
Amazingly well explained concepts connected with a nice mix of real-life applications in the lectures! Enjoyed the occasional humour that made the course easy to digest! Thanks much for the course!
476 - Probability and Statistics: To p or not to p? 的 489 个评论(共 489 个)
创建者 Daniel D
•May 9, 2019
Nice overall introduction to statistics, but suffers from bad grading mecanism when perofrming peer graded assignments.
创建者 Rahul V S
•Apr 7, 2022
Assignments are too simple and are not in the proper readable format. Videos lack animation and are mostly wordy.
创建者 Yogendra C
•May 19, 2020
the course is good but the first two week are boring and there I have lose my interest in this course
创建者 Deepa N
•Sep 27, 2020
Not as much hands on as I hoped
创建者 PARDESHI R H
•May 11, 2020
Easy to teach Probability
创建者 NaingLin H
•Jun 1, 2020
I achieve new knowledge.
创建者 Steven S
•Apr 26, 2021
The lectures and lecture notes are pretty good, but they lack pretty much any derivations. The weekly homework is trivial - just look through your notes and find the correct definition which was asked for, it's multiple choice. You don't have to do any calculations. That last sentence is literally correct. There are two peer graded assignments where you have to do some simple calculations, but they are very simple. I can't overemphasize how simple they are.
If you haven't take a real class in stats then you will see a lot of cool things and learn next to nothing. If you have taken a class in stats then this is an easy trip down memory lane.
In order to learn math you have to do math. There are no good homework problems.
创建者 Stacey J
•May 25, 2020
This is my third Coursera course and the first which I did not enjoy. Many issues with being able to read the formulae in the quizzes and assignments. These were displayed bizarely and not the same as the video lectures nor the course notes. This is difficult information for many people to understand so consistency is key. In addition, I have not seen one response from a moderator (other courses had moderators responding to questions). In any type of math, stats courses it is imperative to have moderators helping students to ensure misinformation is not learned from student to student learning.
创建者 Justin F
•Apr 9, 2021
The selection of topics covered is great, the lectures pretty good and the difficulty level reasonable, but the execution is incredibly shoddy/sloppy. Typo-filled lecture transcripts, unreadable quiz questions (because mathematical symbols didn't render properly), and unclear assignment instructions. One gets the impression that they put the course up online a while back and then pretty much forgot about it
创建者 Randy A
•Jun 14, 2021
In week 3, the quiz is improperly formatted. A bunch of us students have commented on this in the discussion boards with no resolution.
创建者 phantasma669
•May 12, 2022
Very formalistic with not much explanations about the formulas. It get too complicated very fast.
创建者 graceinthesticks
•Apr 30, 2020
much lower level than expected. nice course for people who've not done alevel stats.
创建者 Espen S
•Apr 20, 2021
unspecific and uninteresting
创建者 Deleted A
•Oct 28, 2022
worth nothing