Chevron Left
返回到 Game Theory

学生对 Stanford University 提供的 Game Theory 的评价和反馈

4.6
4,880 个评分

课程概述

Popularized by movies such as "A Beautiful Mind," game theory is the mathematical modeling of strategic interaction among rational (and irrational) agents. Beyond what we call `games' in common language, such as chess, poker, soccer, etc., it includes the modeling of conflict among nations, political campaigns, competition among firms, and trading behavior in markets such as the NYSE. How could you begin to model keyword auctions, and peer to peer file-sharing networks, without accounting for the incentives of the people using them? The course will provide the basics: representing games and strategies, the extensive form (which computer scientists call game trees), Bayesian games (modeling things like auctions), repeated and stochastic games, and more. We'll include a variety of examples including classic games and a few applications. You can find a full syllabus and description of the course here: http://web.stanford.edu/~jacksonm/GTOC-Syllabus.html There is also an advanced follow-up course to this one, for people already familiar with game theory: https://hua.dididi.sbs/learn/gametheory2/ You can find an introductory video here: http://web.stanford.edu/~jacksonm/Intro_Networks.mp4...

热门审阅

EC

Feb 23, 2023

Love this course. Really interesting to learn. This subject was very problematic for me when I studied at the University and now I am pretty friendly with it thanks to the Professors of the course.

AS

Jan 26, 2019

Excellent course for beginners. Problem sets are very creative. No more further resources needed. I found this course specially useful if the purpose is to apply Game Theory in other disciplines.

筛选依据:

876 - Game Theory 的 900 个评论(共 975 个)

创建者 Jai S V

Jul 13, 2017

Insightful & Quantitative

创建者 Nikhil Y

May 26, 2020

very persistent course!!

创建者 Oguzhan O

Apr 22, 2020

Thanks for the efforts

创建者 Soufiane R

Jul 10, 2022

Thank you at all...

创建者 Ishita N

Sep 11, 2021

great explainations

创建者 Hedy W

Jun 14, 2017

Easy to understand.

创建者 Sam D E

Jul 6, 2022

Whole lot of logic

创建者 Surya R

Nov 8, 2017

More coding please

创建者 Subham S

Sep 1, 2017

awesome experience

创建者 Nothing N

Aug 19, 2024

pretty W course

创建者 Antariksha M

Sep 8, 2019

Great Learning

创建者 Sarotree P

Mar 10, 2018

good content

创建者 Marcela

Sep 29, 2017

Good course.

创建者 Peter Z

Feb 15, 2017

Good Course

创建者 Jukka A

Nov 29, 2021

I enjoyed!

创建者 Zsa S

Jul 30, 2025

enjoyable

创建者 sabino g

Jan 16, 2025

very good

创建者 Risky A R

Sep 2, 2024

mantapppp

创建者 Vandana B

Jul 30, 2021

Xperience

创建者 1089

Sep 24, 2016

Not bad!

创建者 Juan C

Sep 30, 2019

Great

创建者 李怡

Jul 12, 2017

烧脑,

创建者 amadie g

Sep 19, 2021

ok

创建者 Andrew Z

May 19, 2018

This could be a good course but some of the instruction is severely lacking. One of the instructors really seems to be phoning it in... in one module he provides two videos, where one is the exact same as the other except an additional minute of material. In another he teaches the exact same material as a different instructor (same slides and all).

Be prepared to spend more time on YouTube watching videos than on the lectures here. After the first few weeks the lectures simply do not prepare you to answer the problem sets (which often contain grammatically confused questions which may or may not change the answer).

All in all the material is very interesting and two of the instructors do a very good job explaining mathematical notation. I would say it would be very helpful to have an understanding of set theory and mathematical notation... there is very little heavy math required. If you understand a few calculus concepts (like limits) the number crunching portion isn't very taxing.

创建者 Arthur S

Sep 18, 2019

Not a bad course. I enjoyed a lot of the content but personally I work best with many practice examples to build an intuition of the concepts. This was unfortunately lacking across all the weeks in my opinion, several different topics were covered each week with each having only one or two practice examples.

As a result I think that I completed many of the weeks without having a deep understanding of a lot of the content. The areas that I did have a good understanding of were supplemented by external resources on youtube, quora etc. These explained the concepts in a more intuitive way than digging into the algebra which much of this course is.

I think that if more practice examples had been provided as a supplement or if more in video quizzes and longer test sets were present I would have given this a four or five but I was not blown away by the course in it's current iteration.