学生对 ESSEC Business School 提供的 International and Cross-Cultural Negotiation 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
MO
Jun 21, 2020
How to communicate and negotiate with another culture avoiding clcihé and steretoypes, it was just fascinating and essential learning, very high quality from the whole Teacher's team! thank you
RS
Aug 11, 2020
Very insightful, I learnt lots of new information to help me better in my cultural interactions. Strongly recommend everyone takes this course, it helps us understand each other better.
101 - International and Cross-Cultural Negotiation 的 125 个评论(共 155 个)
创建者 Valerie F Ñ
•Apr 5, 2021
great course!
创建者 Guy G
•Apr 2, 2018
great course
创建者 Freddy L
•Mar 17, 2018
Very helpful
创建者 PYAYALA S R
•Jun 7, 2025
very useful
创建者 JULISSA A C H
•Oct 24, 2024
Excelente!
创建者 Michelle C G
•Oct 21, 2022
Muy bueno
创建者 Deleted A
•Jan 25, 2022
Thank you
创建者 Alibek M
•Nov 10, 2020
Recommend!
创建者 Francisco R O D
•Sep 30, 2025
muy bueno
创建者 RANGEL G C
•Sep 26, 2021
very good
创建者 Osama s h a
•Feb 7, 2021
Good luck
创建者 Nabil M
•Oct 5, 2020
Excellent
创建者 Bulent G
•May 23, 2020
Thank you
创建者 Maria C O I
•Mar 1, 2019
Excellent
创建者 Maria J G P
•May 17, 2021
excelent
创建者 santisteban h
•Mar 28, 2019
exellent
创建者 Саламат Н С
•Oct 15, 2024
Керемеи
创建者 Maria A O R
•Jun 26, 2021
GENIAL!
创建者 Michel B C
•Dec 13, 2020
perfect
创建者 dWilliez S
•Apr 22, 2025
Good
创建者 SHIRLEY M T I
•Apr 21, 2022
good
创建者 MERIEM I
•Jan 14, 2025
top
创建者 Yoselyn L S S
•Jun 5, 2024
.
创建者 Massimo E
•Nov 27, 2020
T
创建者 Koen D
•May 28, 2019
Interesting topic and useful insights. I think three areas could be improved in future versions. (A) Some of the videos are quite "theoretical", discussing frameworks and mentioning names of concepts which are not always explained in detail. (E.g. I felt the discussion of Hofstede's five dimensions could definitely have been expanded to explain some in more detail, with more examples and what they mean in negotiations). (B) Several of the quizzes are poorly worded, with the "correct" answer sometimes so close to a cultural cliché that I would have thought it an obvious trap. In some other cases the questions and answers were ambiguous. I think the quizzes could therefore use a re-think. (C) For me, the concrete examples (e.g. on COP21) at the end of the course were one of the most valuable aspects. If possible I would suggest expanding the number of examples and the level of detail, and integrating them throughout the course rather than in the final module. For instance, the COP21 negotiation could be used as a "fil rouge" throughout the course?