-

i

ش

k

g

.

.

*

a

g

N

G

I

v

E

T

E

The course itself is very good, but I have to lower my review rating because of the peer scored task in module 3. Due to the anonymity of peers on Coursera, there are a lot of trolls who put lowest scores "just because" without giving an explanation what they want you to improve, and there is no way to reach out to them to collect their feedback. So, the peer review tasks are close to pointless, as you get no prompts on what you could improve, and it basically depends on your luck if you land on a decent peer or a troll. A more extensive multiple choice quizzes to see how you understood the theory or even an AI rated text submission has more value. My submission completed all requirements, but passed only on 4th attempt (with minor changes like highlighting key words as people are lazy to actually read), as for the first 3 attempts I kept landing on a duo of a peer giving me 3 points overall and a troll giving me 1 point overall - no explanation why and what was lacking.

The information contained is excellent and I have already learned a lot. However, many questions on quizzes of this course are poorly phrased, causing confusion where clarity would be better. The worst part was actually in the peer review, the grading system was laid out in a way which does not allow you to pass without a perfect score, but this is not indicated. Therefore, people who liked a paper I wrote accidentally did not pass my document based on this fact. It's a shame that the mechanics of the course slowed the pace and made it harder to pass when the instructor is clearly very intelligent and qualified, and provided so much good information. I love the way the information was tied into history and other relevant things as well, being a history buff myself. I do recommend the course, but I would hope that it could be improved mechanically from the user end.

Very Good course.

Very Good course.

In my view some needed additions to be excellent. Summaries of the important issues in each lecture video can be introduced might be in a form of Power Point Presentation. This will highlight the main topics. This can be done for each video, each lesson and each module.

Prof. Dr. John Budd have already made these summaries and conclusions during his video lectures, but it is not easy to retrieve when you are searching about some specific subject. You have to here again a group of videos to find what you need.

I loved the information and the learning.

I felt as if some of the quiz questions were trick questions. As an University Instructor myself, I like to avoid what appear to be trick questions.

Thank you for the great knowledge and reinforcing that the last company I worked for was one with Poor HR Management. This learning supported what I have done well and what an organization does poorly that will send employees running.

I like it very much, enjoying doing the task required and review some video several times to be sure that I well understood. I didn't like the law part, even if I can understand why it is necessary, focusing on US laws in a open worldwide on line course is kind of useless, because a lot of people aren't probably from the US. I wish that time were more focusing on giving us practical example on HR practises.

It's understanding Human Resource in a whole new light. One thing I learned is that all managers who manage people are in effect Human Resource managers and this role is not just limited to the set of staff computing our salaries or creating engagement activities to promote work motivations (pencil pushing). It's also great to know how to determine and handle different motivations of people to work.