学生对 The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 提供的 Vector Calculus for Engineers 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
OO
Jun 27, 2020
THE LECTURER WAS SO AMAZING AND EVEN THOUGH I WASN'T IN A FACE TO FACE REAL LIFE CLASS WITH HIM, EVERYTHING WAS STILL DETAILED LIKE A REAL CLASSROOM SETTING WOULD HAVE BEEN
BP
May 14, 2021
Professor Chasnov is a great instructor. I strongly recommend this course (and others from his). Thank you so much for making such great quality content available for everyone no matter where.
351 - Vector Calculus for Engineers 的 375 个评论(共 384 个)
创建者 Ahmed A T
•Aug 28, 2021
a very good course. Thanks a lot for professor Chasnov
创建者 Farman u
•May 28, 2023
interesting and helpful in teaching vector calculus
创建者 ka h N
•May 3, 2021
A challenging but useful egineering math course!
创建者 César A L L
•May 2, 2020
Great introduction to multivariate calculus.
创建者 Ezra B
•Jul 12, 2021
Was pretty hard to understand after week 2.
创建者 Trinanjan B
•Jun 27, 2021
Good course to learn the basics!
创建者 Vaigund.v
•Feb 4, 2022
it ok not that much useful
创建者 Oluwanifemi A
•Jul 2, 2020
It was well explanatory
创建者 GURUPRASATH N
•Apr 24, 2025
GOOD KNOWLEDGE GAINING
创建者 manohar r
•Jun 9, 2020
Good one for learners.
创建者 Qamar A
•May 19, 2020
teacher is very good
创建者 Mr. A G
•Aug 18, 2021
its a good course..
创建者 Nanda K
•Sep 29, 2020
good so useful
创建者 K. B L
•Apr 26, 2020
useful course
创建者 Udoh U E
•Jul 9, 2020
It was good.
创建者 Vidhya A P
•Aug 31, 2020
very useful
创建者 Gajanan D
•Aug 6, 2020
Very nice
创建者 Dr R M
•Jun 5, 2020
excellent
创建者 rameshwari
•Jan 27, 2023
Good
创建者 Kariyapperuma A D R K
•Dec 22, 2020
good
创建者 aithagoni m
•Jun 26, 2020
good
创建者 Sumathi M
•Feb 2, 2023
nil
创建者 Carlos M G
•Mar 16, 2021
m
创建者 Ogunpola J G
•Jul 12, 2020
I
创建者 Mauro
•Sep 20, 2024
Pros: -Professor seemed very enthusiastic. -Topics were explained in a thorough yet concise manner. -Practice exercises were useful to review topics. -Professor was very quick when answering questions. -I especially liked how derivation and integration were taught, it was very useful. Cons: -My main issue is probably with assessments. The material given was rather difficult (which is not necessarily a bad thing), yet assessments were quite trivial. All of them were multiple choice questions with practically an infinite number of possible attempts, so although I carefully read through the entirety of the material, I do not feel as accomplished. A simple solution for this would be to ask for a numerical solution to problems. -Related to the previous point, all practice quizzes had their answers in the answer sheets, which also decreases the effort needed for the course (no, I am not going to try and solve all of them on my own if I have the answer right there). -A few topics were not very useful (e.g., quaternions, Kronecker-delta, Einstein's summation). I understand their historical significance, but they were taught briefly in a very specific context and never again used. -Professor's answers were often too succint. -A few demonstrations skipped a step or two, which made reading sometimes more difficult than it should have. Nevertheless, I appreciate the effort put into the answer sheets. -I would had liked a few more intuitive real-life situations (e.g., electrodynamics), as to relate the course to engineering.