too many podcasts with no point

Lots to read, little practise.

it should having more stuff

It can be more interactive.

Couldn't find the podcast

Loved the readings.

It was average

certificate?

interesting

Excelente

NORMAL

good

DONE

تمت

There are two reasons why I rated this as 2*. Firstly , this shows that great content does not necessarily equal a course. The content in the course is top notch, but it is mostly delivered in a series of podcasts rather than in a structured lesson format. What's more the assignments don't always match. Probably worst of all, it is far too easy to pass the course. The multiple choice quizzes just require common sense. I passed module 5 without listening to any of the content. The peer-assessment are an absolute joke. I was graded 100% by my peers and my submissions were weak. 12 of the 14 submissions I peer-reviewed were terrible, but I bet they all passed with 100% too (or at least they were by others except for me). Passing this course is uttelry meaningless, but if you have good self-study skills, a student could, if they chose, learn a lot from the content

The course is exceptional, I have learned so many things regarding marketing, content writing and strategic use of it. There were amazing exercises to understand profiling my niche and how to write compelling headline. Each and every piece of knowledge was great. For this I gave 2 starts, I would have given 5 stars if the author of the content would not have attacked and profiled my country, Romania in the content, with allusion that Romania is a country of IT law infringers. THIS IS HIGHLY UNETHICAL, RACIST AND PREJUDICIVE AGAINST MY COUNTRY. I am surprised that Coursera did not react till now to change anything in this direction. Maybe because this kind of talk is highly approved and accepted.

El curso está genial, pero al ser en inglés me ha costado mucho seguirlo. De hecho, los podcast no he podido escucharlos, por lo que el aprendizaje se me ha quedado corto. La fórmula de que los trabajos los evalúen otros compañeros tampoco me parece muy adecuado, porque la mayor parte de ellos están en inglés y, ni yo entendía muy bien algunos de ellos, ni algunos compañeros entendieron los míos.

The materials are quite old and have a lot of dead links. The assignments could be clearer. Especially as the teacher no longer works at Copyblogger, this feels a bit outdated and ready for some improvements.

I do like a lot of the materials and I think it did help me a lot- but that's all the more reason why it could stand to be refreshed.

my assignment since module 3 is yet to be reviewed by other coursemates which are causing a delay in completion of my course, I am done with my course up to the 5th week but cant still finish up, I can't send a mail for help nobody to attend to me, please something should be done about it asap.

The peer assignment in chapter 4 was ridiculous. I passed everything else with no problem, but rewrote the peer assignment 4 times and still had students giving me a 3, no opinion, with no response as to why they gave me this response, or as someone did, paste in some jibberish as a response.

I was expecting a great course. All materials you can freely read on their blog - nothing new there. Too much bla bla - huge big way to the point. The idea of the course is nice, but it is not equal to what you get during the course.

Assignment directions were not clear. It was hard to connect the empathy map with the directions and expectations of this course. The content itself was just recycled statements and overly repetitive.

mine time is valuable because the course does not have an actual certificate from that university and it is not fair to pay so that they do not give you a certificate as it should be.

First two weeks were ok and kinda useful but repetitive. Week three was ultra repetitive and couldn´t even finished the course because it was so boring, sorry.

Content is weak and too broad. More than a course content, it was a podcast between two people who just talked about their own past experiences.